Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Promoting and safeguarding the welfare of children

A bridge too far

Bibliographic Data

ID12897151
AuthorsJane Tunstill (King's College London, corresponding author), Jane Aldgate (The Open University), June Thoburn (0000-0001-8263-2164, University of East Anglia)
Year2010
Volume5
Issue3
Pages14-24
Publication date2010-09-27
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Children s Services (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1746-6660 • E-ISSN: 2042-8677
PublisherEmerald Publishing Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.5042/jcs.2010.0547
OpenAlexW2161814996
LanguageEN
Citations received4
References cited11

This article describes the contrast between the clearly expressed and optimistic intentions of section 17 of the Children Act 1989, namely to produce a genuine service continuum that will promote and safeguard the welfare of children, and the reality of the post‐1989 implementation process. It shows how, over decades, perennial challenges have consistently skewed the balance between proactive family support services and reactive crisis‐driven responses in favour of the latter. Drawing on government‐commissioned evaluations, including two on out‐of‐home care and family centres respectively, the authors conclude that the Act has failed to change this balance for the better. Primary factors in this include inadequate funding and the risk‐averse responses of policy‐makers and politicians

Balance (ability · Bridge (graph theory · Business · Child protection · Economics · Government (linguistics · Political science · Public economics · Public relations · Safeguard · Safeguarding · Service (business · Welfare · Child Abuse and Trauma · Child and Adolescent Health · Homelessness and Social Issues · Law · Medicine · Nursing · Psychology · Public Administration · Marketing

  • ‘Troubled families’, ‘troublesome families’ and the trouble with Payment by Results

    June Thoburn•Families Relationships and…•2013

  • Challenges for marginalized minority parents in different welfare systems

    Open Access•Katrin Križ, Marit Skivenes•International Social Work•2012

  • Vulnerable Family Meetings

    Open Access•Justin Woodman, Ruth Gilbert et al.•Social Sciences•2014

  • The place of “think family” approaches in child and family social work

    Open Access•June Thoburn, Neil Cooper et al.•Children and Youth Services Review•2013

  • Recognising and responding to child maltreatment

    Open Access•Ruth Gilbert, Alison Kemp et al.•The Lancet•2009

  • Do Integrated Children’s Services Improve Children’s Outcomes

    Open Access•Margaret O’brien, M Bachmann et al.•Children & Society•2009

  • Sure Start Local Programmes

    Open Access•Jane Tunstill, Debbie Allnock et al.•Children & Society•2005

  • Improving Children's Services Networks

    Open Access•Roger Smith•Journal of Children s Services•2007

  • The Department of Health research studies in child protection

    Open Access•Rupert Hughes•Child & Family Social Work•1996

  • The nurse–family partnership

    Open Access•David L Olds•Infant Mental Health Journal•2006

  • The Family and the New Right

    Ruth Levitas, Pamela Abbot et al.•British Journal of Sociology•1994

  • Strategies for the Prevention of Social Exclusion

    Open Access•Marian Barnes, Kristal Morris et al.•Journal of Social Policy•2008

Citations per year0.29
Citation span2012 - 2014 (3)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae