Hasty discussion, cross-cutting exposure, and tolerance
A comparative study of South Korean and American online discussants
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 12898535 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Jiyoung Lee (0000-0002-0800-9355, Syracuse University), Yun‐Jung Choi (0000-0002-0160-8902, Ewha Womans University, autor correspondente) |
| Ano | 2018 |
| Volume | 80 |
| Fascículo | 6 |
| Páginas | 570-594 |
| Data de publicação | 2018-01-30 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | International Communication Gazette (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 1748-0485 • E-ISSN: 1748-0493 |
| Editora | SAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/1748048518754376 |
| OpenAlex | W2790925111 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 2 |
| Referências citadas | 42 |
The positive relationship between cross-cutting exposure and tolerance has long been a topic in the political communication field. By reinvestigating this issue, this study further explores whether hasty discussion moderates the relationship from a cross-cultural perspective by comparing South Korea with the United States. The authors posit that hasty discussion—a term that was coined to explain South Korean’s fast lifestyle as reflected in discussion processes—is a South Korean characteristic that can have deleterious effects on deliberative democracy. Nine hundred and sixty survey participants (480 South Koreans and 480 Americans) showed meaningful results: (1) Hasty discussion comprises two factors (ignoring discussion processes and pursuing discussion efficiency). (2) Americans are exposed to more cross-cutting opinions than South Koreans, but the positive relationship between cross-cutting exposure and tolerance is more significant in the South Korean sample. (3) In the South Korean sample, ignoring discussion processes negatively affected tolerance. (4) An interaction effect of ignoring discussion processes and cross-cutting exposure on tolerance was found among South Koreans. That is, ignoring the discussion process lowered tolerance
Cross-cultural · Perspective (graphical · Political science · Politics · Sample (material · Law · Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence · Psychology · Social and Intergroup Psychology · Social Media and Politics · Social Psychology
Pathways to Political Participation? Religion, Communication Contexts, and Mass Media
The impact of Confucianism on organizational communication
Bowling alone
A Theory of Justice
Political Communication and Deliberation
The Influences of Familism on Interpersonal Trust of Korean Public Officials
Rethinking the Fallacy of Hasty Generalization
The Use of Exploratory Factor Analysis and Principal Components Analysis in Communication Research
Social networks and Internet connectivity effects
Cultural difference in motivations for using social network sites
Polarization and Partisan Selective Exposure
Hearing the Other Side
Cross-cultural communication patterns
Online vs. Face-to-Face Deliberation
On Tolerating the Unreasonable
Hierarchical Multiple Regression in Counseling Research
The Reflection of Cultural Parameters on Videostyles of Televised Political Spots in the US and Korea
The Workplace as a Context for Cross-Cutting Political Discourse
On Legitimacy and Political Deliberation
Deliberative Toleration
American Muslim Investment in Civil Society
Does Disagreement Contribute to More Deliberative Opinion
Cross-Cutting Messages and Political Tolerance
The Conditional Effect of Network Diversity and Values on Tolerance
Enigmas of Intolerance
Political Knowledge, Political Engagement, and Civic Education
The Impact of Diversity in Informal Social Networks on Tolerance in Japan
It's Good To Talk
Culture, dialectics, and reasoning about contradiction
The Psychology of Prejudice
Cross-cutting Social Networks
Facilitating Communication across Lines of Political Difference
Speed and democracy
Populist Politics, Communications Media and Large Scale Societal Integration
The Strength of Weak Ties
Acculturation Strategies and Integrative Complexity
| Obras citantes distintas | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 0,67 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2023 - 2025 (3) |
| Velocidade de citação | recent |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 2 |