The Drivers of Science Referenced in US EPA Regulatory Impact Analyses
Open Access, Professional Popularity, and Agency Involvement
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12899650 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Tyler Andrew Scott (0000-0002-4214-5895), Sojeong Kim (0000-0002-1662-6855), Liza Wood (0000-0003-4325-6498) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Publication date | 2025-04-30 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Regulation & Governance (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1748-5983 • E-ISSN: 1748-5991 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/rego.70026 |
| OpenAlex | W4410013756 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 47 |
We perform bibliometric analysis on documents for 255 Regulatory Impact Analyzes (RIAs) prepared by the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) from 1980 through 2024. Using a series of automated information extraction methods, we extract references from these documents and match them to bibliographic records. We then build a database of relevant articles (whether cited in an RIA or not) and fit a two‐stage regression model that predicts whether, and how many times, a reference is used in RIAs as a function of journal prestige, professional popularity, article accessibility, EPA funding, and involvement of EPA employees as co‐authors. By considering cited and uncited articles related to similar scientific concepts, we can observe systematic differences in what types of research products get used in policy analysis. Academic popularity, open access status, and EPA authorship and sponsorship all predict more likely and more frequent article use. Articles in prestigious journals are no more likely to be referenced, but once referenced in the corpus are then referenced more frequently
Agency (philosophy · Biology · Business · Economics · Open Science · Political science · Popularity · Public economics · Public relations · Regulatory agency · Regulatory science · Social science · Sociology · Law · Public Administration · Regulation and Compliance Studies · Risk Perception and Management · Accounting · Ecology
Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models
Regression Models for Count Data in R
Bayesian Spatial Modelling with R - Inla
Penalising Model Component Complexity
Overton
The Science of Bureaucracy
Above Politics
The Honest Broker
States of Knowledge
The Science–Policy Nexus in Collaborative Governance
The production and use of knowledge in regulatory impact assessment – An empirical analysis
If Dissemination Is the Solution, What Is the Problem
The Many Meanings of Research Utilization
The knowledge behind Brexit. A bibliographic analysis of ex-ante policy appraisals on Brexit in the United Kingdom and the European Union
Explaining the content of impact assessment in the United Kingdom
Does business influence government regulations? New evidence from Canadian impact assessments
Nudging the nudger
Public policy's bibliography
Incorporating equity and justice concerns in regulation
The Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs and the durability of regulatory oversight in the United States
The influence of expert groups
Diffusion of Regulatory Impact Analysis Among OECD and EU Member States
Boundary Organizations in Environmental Policy and Science
Science Use in Regulatory Impact Analysis
Brand Credibility, Brand Consideration, and Choice
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |