Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Crowdsourcing and regulatory reviews

A new way of challenging red tape in B ritish government

Bibliographic Data

ID12899692
AuthorsMartin Lodge (0000-0002-4273-6118), Kai Wegrich (0000-0001-7367-3992)
Year2014
Volume9
Issue1
Pages30-46
Publication date2014-02-12
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueRegulation & Governance (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1748-5983 • E-ISSN: 1748-5991
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/rego.12048
OpenAlexW1599318720
LanguageEN
Citations received32
References cited23

Much has been said about the appeal of digital government devices to enhance consultation on rulemaking. This paper explores the most ambitious attempt by the UK central government so far to draw on “crowdsourcing” to consult and act on regulatory reform, the “Red Tape Challenge.” We find that the results of this exercise do not represent any major change to traditional challenges to consultation processes. Instead, we suggest that the extensive institutional arrangements for crowdsourcing were hardly significant in informing actual policy responses: neither the tone of the crowdsourced comments, the direction of the majority views, nor specific comments were seen to matter. Instead, it was processes within the executive that shaped the overall governmental responses to this initiative. The findings, therefore, provoke wider debates about the use of social media in rulemaking and consultation exercises

Appeal · Business · Crowdsourcing · Government (linguistics · Political science · Public relations · Rulemaking · Law · Political Influence and Corporate Strategies · Public Policy and Administration Research · Regulation and Compliance Studies

  • Framing contestation and public influence on policymakers

    Open Access•Daniel S Schiff•Policy and Society•2024

  • A systematic literature review of open innovation in the public sector

    Open Access•Rui Mu, Huanming Wang•Public Management Review•2022

  • Crowdsourcing

    Open Access•Helen K Liu•Policy & Internet•2021

  • The Internet and public policy

    Open Access•Helen Z Margetts, Helen Margetts et al.•Policy & Internet•2021

  • The evolving nature of labour inspection, enforcement of employment rights and the regulatory reach of the state in Britain

    Open Access•Stephen Mustchin, Miguel Martinez Lucio•Journal of Industrial Relations•2020

  • Conceptualization and measurement of regulatory discretion

    Open Access•Nir Kosti•Regulation & Governance•2024

  • When does open government shut? Predicting government responses to citizen information requests

    Open Access•Benjamin E Bagozzi, Daniel Berliner et al.•Regulation & Governance•2019

  • Technocracy, democracy, and public policy

    Open Access•Mercy DeMenno•Regulation & Governance•2017

  • Explaining the content of impact assessment in the United Kingdom

    Open Access•Oliver Fritsch, Jonathan C Kamkhaji et al.•Regulation & Governance•2017

  • The final arbiter of everything”

    Open Access•R Duschinsky, Charlotte Paddison•Social Theory & Health•2017

  • The implementation of administrative burden reduction policy

    Open Access•Fabrizio Di Mascio, Alessandro Natalini et al.•Comparative European Politics•2015

  • The role of transparency in regulatory governance

    Susan E Dudley, Kai Wegrich•Journal of Risk Research•2015

  • Which Social Media Facilitate Online Public Opinion in China

    Open Access•D Stockmann, Ting Luo•Problems of Post-Communism•2017

  • What can open innovation be used for and how does it create value

    Open Access•Keld Pedersen•Government Information Quarterly•2020

  • The value of social media data

    Open Access•Panos Panagiotopoulos, F Bowen et al.•Government Information Quarterly•2017

  • The effect of crowdsourcing on organizational learning

    Open Access•R Lenart-Gansiniec•Government Information Quarterly•2021

  • Do public comments make a difference in open rulemaking? Insights from information management using machine learning and QCA analysis

    Open Access•Alex Ingrams•Government Information Quarterly•2022

  • The ‘forever war’ on red tape and the struggle to improve regulation

    Open Access•Arie Freiberg, Monica Pfeffer et al.•Australian Journal of Public…•2022

  • The implications of Covid-19 for concepts and practices of citizenship

    M Jae Moon, B Shine Cho•Policy & Politics•2022

  • Do monetary or nonmonetary incentives promote citizens' use of a government crowdsourcing

    Open Access•Danbee Lee, Yeonkyung Kim et al.•Public Administration•2024

  • The Impact of Open Data in the Uk

    Open Access•Ben Worthy•Public Administration•2015

  • Big data for policymaking

    Open Access•Sarah Giest•Policy Sciences•2017

  • Learning from Our Mistakes

    Open Access•Alex Ingrams, Suzanne J Piotrowski et al.•Perspectives on Public Management…•2020

  • Administrative Reform and the Quest for Openness

    Open Access•Alex Ingrams•Administration & Society•2020

  • A shallow rationalisation? ‘Merger mania‘ and side-effects in the reorganisation of public-service delivery

    Silvia Bolgherini, Cristina Dallara et al.•Contemporary Italian Politics•2019

  • Watching the wheels

    Open Access•Ben Worthy, Cat Morgan et al.•Interest Groups & Advocacy•2025

  • The prospects of E-democracy

    Oren Pérez, Judit Bar‐Ilan et al.•Journal of Information Technology…•2018

  • Regulation governance in the digital era

    Open Access•Patrice Dutil, Julie Williams•Canadian Public Administration•2017

  • Between Ordinary Harm and Deviance

    Open Access•J Heydon•The British Journal of Criminology•2023

  • Government Openness and Public Trust

    Open Access•Lisa Hohensinn, Lisa Schmidthuber et al.•Public Administration Review•2020

  • Regulating with the masses? Mapping the spread of participatory regulation

    Hanan Haber, Eva Heim et al.•Journal of European Public Policy•2020

  • The Rationality Paradox of Nudge

    Open Access•Martin Lodge, Kai Wegrich•Law & Policy•2016

  • Crowdsourcing As a Solution to Distant Search

    Allan Afuah, Christopher L Tucci•Academy of Management Review•2012

  • Democracy and E-Rulemaking

    David Schlosberg, Zavestoski et al.•Journal of Information Technology…•2007

  • Crowdsourcing the Public Participation Process for Planning Projects

    Open Access•Daren C Brabham•Planning Theory•2009

  • Information Technology and Regulatory Policy

    Open Access•Cary Coglianese•Social Science Computer Review•2004

  • Electronic Rulemaking

    Open Access•Stuart W Shulman, David Schlosberg et al.•Social Science Computer Review•2003

  • From e-government to we-government

    Open Access•Dennis Linders•Government Information Quarterly•2012

  • Centralization or Diffusion

    Open Access•Alon Peled•Administration & Society•2001

  • Explaining Variation in Perceptions of Red Tape

    Open Access•Gene A Brewer, Richard M Walker•Public Administration•2010

  • A Theory of Culture‐switching

    Open Access•Donald P Moynihan•Public Administration•2012

  • A Bias Towards Business? Assessing Interest Group Influence on the U.S. Bureaucracy

    Jason Webb Yackee, Susan Webb Yackee•The Journal of Politics•2005

  • Information technology and public commenting on agency regulations

    Open Access•Steven J Balla, Benjamin Daniels et al.•Regulation & Governance•2007

  • Politics of E‐Government

    Open Access•Michael J Ahn, Stuart Bretschneider•Public Administration Review•2011

  • The Impact of Red Tape on Governmental Performance

    Gene A Brewer, Richard M Walker•Journal of Public Administration…•2010

  • Organizational Red Tape

    Megan Feeney, M K Feeney•Journal of Public Administration…•2012

  • Assessing Inter-Institutional Attention to and Influence on Government Regulations

    Open Access•Susan Webb Yackee•British Journal of Political…•2006

  • New Public Management Is Dead--Long Live Digital-Era Governance

    Patrick Dunleavy•Journal of Public Administration…•2005

  • Crowdsourcing as a Model for Problem Solving

    Open Access•Daren C Brabham•Convergence The International…•2008

Unique citing works32
Citations per year2,91
Citation span2015 - 2025 (11)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 32

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae