Rights and responsibilities
The intergenerational covenant
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12899758 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Amitai Etzioni (0000-0002-2324-5890, George Washington University, corresponding author), Laura Brodbeck |
| Year | 2012 |
| Volume | 28 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 113-117 |
| Publication date | 2012-03-16 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Comparative Social Welfare (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1748-6831 • E-ISSN: 1748-684X |
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/17486831.2012.655981 |
| OpenAlex | W2028860066 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 3 |
Debates around pension policy are often couched in terms of rights, while corresponding responsibilities associated with these rights are often regarded as onerous and oppressive. This is an unsatisfactory basis for designing pension institutions, since rights cannot be sustained without responsibilities. Social commitments, such as the commitment implied in the Social Security Act, reflect an intergenerational covenant that must be protected by younger generations who will only see benefits if future generations remain committed to the same responsibilities. The contract between America and its elders is not a real-time contract but one in which carrying out one's duties precedes collecting one's entitlements. Each right lays a claim on someone; and if that person does not honour the responsibilities of that claim, there can be no regime of rights. In short, the design of pensions around rights requires the public authority to address their corresponding responsibilities
Covenant · Fundamental rights · Honour · Human rights · Law and economics · Pension · Political science · Reservation of rights · Right to property · Social security · Sociology · Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis · Law
| Citations per year | 0.1 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2016 - 2016 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |