Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Individual and collective responsibility

Mandated private pensions in a comparative perspective

Bibliographic Data

ID12899799
AuthorsMark Hyde (0009-0009-7338-0298, University of Plymouth, corresponding author), John Dixon (0000-0002-3972-6437, KIMEP University)
Year2009
Volume25
Issue2
Pages119-127
Publication date2009-06-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Comparative Social Welfare (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1748-6831 • E-ISSN: 1748-684X
PublisherTaylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/17486830902789749
OpenAlexW2046867733
LanguageEN
Citations received7
References cited11

For a growing number of social policy analysts, the privatisation of pensions should be understood as an integral element of welfare retrenchment. Driven by the core values of “neo-liberalism”, it is intended to diminish collective responsibility for retirement income futures. We take issue with this characterisation of pensions privatisation. A cross-national comparative analysis of mandated private pensions suggests that the market orientation of their design is generally ambivalent. While the architects of these arrangements have embraced market principles, they have also accepted the principle of collective responsibility. The privatisation of pensions has not been informed, universally or comprehensively, by the core values of neo-liberalism

Collective responsibility · Economics · Element (criminal law · Law and economics · Liberalism · Political science · Public relations · Retrenchment · Social responsibility · Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism · Law · Political and Economic history of UK and US · Public Administration · Social Policy and Reform Studies

  • Assessing Input Legitimacy of Occupational Pensions in Europe

    Open Access•Thomas Mayer, Tobias Wiß•Regulation & Governance•2024

  • Input and Output Legitimacy of Occupational Pension Plans in Six European Countries

    Open Access•J Fernández J, Hayley James et al.•Journal of Comparative Policy…•2026

  • Chile's private pension system at 35

    Open Access•Silvia Borzutzky, Mark Hyde•Journal of International and…•2016

  • Privatizing or Annihilating Social Security

    Open Access•Silvia Borzutzky•Poverty & Public Policy•2018

  • Public–Private Partnerships in European Old‐Age Pension Provision

    Open Access•Ville-Pekka Sorsa, Ville‐Pekka Sorsa•Social Policy and Administration•2016

  • Getting Citizens to Save

    Open Access•Andrea Lawlor•Journal of Social Policy•2016

  • Strengthening Market Principles in Welfare Institutions

    Open Access•Patricia Frericks•Journal of Social Policy•2013

  • Is the Welfare State Justified?

    Open Access•Daniel Shapiro, Daniel J Shapiro•Is the Welfare State Justified?•2007

  • Social Justice, Legitimacy and the Welfare State

    Benjamin Veghte, Steffen Mau•Social Justice, Legitimacy and…•2016

  • Vital Connections

    Open Access•Stephen J Kay, Stephen Kay et al.•Latin American Politics and Society•2003

  • Welfare Retrenchment or Collective Responsibility? The Privatisation of Public Pensions in Western Europe

    Open Access•Mark Hyde, John Dixon et al.•Social Policy and Society•2003

  • Do‐It‐Yourself Social Policy

    Open Access•Rudolf Klein, Rudolf Κlein et al.•Social Policy and Administration•1995

  • The three worlds of welfare capitalism

    Gøsta Esping-Andersen•The three worlds of welfare…•1990

  • Assessing the Capacity of Pension Institutions to Build and Sustain Trust

    Open Access•Mark Hyde, John Dixon et al.•Journal of Social Policy•2007

  • Private Pension Planning

    Open Access•Karen Rowlingson•Journal of Social Policy•2002

Citations per year0.54
Citation span2013 - 2026 (14)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae