Beyond face-to-face
Exploring the restorative potential of shuttle mediation
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12899950 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Masahiro Suzuki (0000-0002-7925-2141, Loughborough University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Publication date | 2025-12-10 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Criminology & Criminal Justice (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1748-8958 • E-ISSN: 1748-8966 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/17488958251400121 |
| OpenAlex | W4417220239 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 53 |
Restorative justice is ideally conducted through face-to-face dialogue between victims and offenders, enabling direct engagement in addressing the aftermath of crime. This personal interaction is considered central to achieving the core aims of restorative justice, including accountability, empathy and healing. However, low rates of victim participation, alongside various practical and emotional constraints, often render face-to-face meetings unfeasible or undesirable. In response, shuttle mediation, where a facilitator conveys messages between the parties separately, has been adopted as a widely used alternative in the United Kingdom. This article explores the potential of shuttle mediation as a restorative justice intervention. Drawing on the existing, albeit limited, body of literature, it argues that while shuttle mediation can embody restorative principles, is widely implemented, and reflects the growing interest in restorative justice practices that extend beyond physical co-presence, its full potential remains unclear due to the paucity of empirical research. To bridge this gap, the article proposes avenues for future research aimed at strengthening the restorative nature of shuttle mediation
Bridge (graph theory · Economic Justice · Facilitator · Mediation · Restorative justice · Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis · Law in Society and Culture · Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
Restoring Harm
What is Restorative Justice? Fresh Answers to a Vexed Question
The evolution of restorative justice in Britain
The impact of Covid-19 on digital communication patterns
How should we define restorative justice? A response to Lode Walgrave
Mitigating risk in restorative justice
From ‘what works’ to ‘how it works’ in research on restorative justice conferencing
Restorative justice during and after Covid-19
Concerns about the meaning of ‘restorative justice’. Reflections of a veteran
Group Conferencing is Associated with Lower Rates of Repeated Recidivism Among Higher-Risk Youth and There are Enhanced Effects Based on Who Attended the Conference
“He went from being a monster to a person
Non-encounter restorative justice interventions – now what
An assessment of the potential outcomes in practising restorative justice in criminal settings in Australia and the United States
Discerning justice
“We’ve Got History Now”
Victim Recovery in Restorative Justice
How Does Restorative Justice Work? A Qualitative Metasynthesis
Is There a Communication Perspective for Digital Restorative Justice? Insights From the Experience of Spanish Facilitators
Hate Crime and Restorative Justice
The Psychological Impact of Restorative Justice Practices on Victims of Crimes—a Systematic Review
Applicability and uses of the online environment in restorative mediation
Is restorative justice conferencing appropriate for youth offenders
Let’s talk about it’
The effectiveness of restorative justice programs
Revisiting the gap between ideals and realities within restorative justice
Restorative justice programs and practices in juvenile justice
Talking punishment
Offender Journeys in Restorative Youth Justice Conferencing
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |