Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Gender and the Greening of Buddhism

Exploring Scope for a Buddhist Ecofeminism in an Ultramodern Age

Bibliographic Data

ID12901166
AuthorsEmma Tomalin (0000-0001-7722-1192, University of Leeds, corresponding author)
Year2018
Volume11
Issue4
Pages455-480
Publication date2018-02-26
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal for the Study of Religion Nature and Culture (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1749-4907 • E-ISSN: 1749-4915
PublisherEquinox Publishing (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1558/jsrnc.32469
OpenAlexW2794202458
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited10

Despite its popularity and appeal for many, ecofeminism has been criticized for essentializing and romanticizing women’s roles as close to nature, thereby reproducing colonialist and biologically determinist discourses that contribute to discrimination. In response there have been attempts to defend ecofeminism, arguing that such critiques are hyperbolic and that we need ecofeminism more than ever (Philips and Rumens 2016). In a climate of renewed interest in ecofeminism, I ask why is it that some faith traditions are represented to a far greater extent in ecofeminist literature than others? I pick up on this discrepancy within ecofeminism’s engagement between different religions through examining Buddhist responses to gender and ecology. In the article I adopt a theory of ultramodern Buddhism, developed by Halafoff and Rajkobal (2015), to understand Buddhism in the contemporary era. Three main research questions are addressed: (1) to what extent has ‘green Buddhism’ been gendered?; (2) why has there has been virtually no attempt to bring together feminist analysis with responses to Buddhism and environmentalism? Why have they been approached separately?; and (3) in what ways are Buddhist women (and men) combining gender analysis and environmentalism in practice in reference to or outside the framework of ecofeminism? To better understand why a Buddhist ecofeminism has not been named and claimed by Buddhists in either the West or Asia, there is a need for local-level empirical studies that examine subjective understandings of relationships between gender and environmentalism in the lives of ultramodern Buddhist practitioners rather than assuming a standard ecofeminist position as the primary reference point

Buddhism · Ecofeminism · Environmental ethics · Environmentalism · Feminism · Political science · Sociology · Theology · Gender Studies · Geographies of human-animal interactions · Law · Philosophy · Religion, Ecology, and Ethics · Theological Perspectives and Practices

  • Religion and Environment

    Philipp Öhlmann, Inette Swart•Religion and Theology•2022

  • Feminism and anthropology

    Henrietta L Moore•Feminism and anthropology•1988

  • Glocalization

    Roland Robertson•Global Modernities•1995

  • Buddhism and ecology

    Damien Keown•Contemporary Buddhism•2007

  • Has Ecofeminism Cornered the Market? Gender Analysis in the Study of Religion, Nature, and Culture

    Tovis Page•Journal for the Study of Religion…•2008

  • Acting with Compassion

    Stephanie Kaza•Journal for the Study of Religion…•1996

  • The Thai bhikkhuni movement and women's empowerment

    Emma Tomalin•Gender & Development•2006

  • Toward a Buddhist Environmental Ethic

    R M Gross•Journal of the American Academy…•1997

  • Ecofeminism Revisited

    Greta Gaard•Feminist formations•2011

  • How environmentalist is Buddhism

    Ian Harris•Religion•1991

  • Earth Mother Myths and Other Ecofeminist Fables

    Open Access•Macedward Leach, Melissa Leach•Development and Change•2007

Citations per year0.25
Citation span2022 - 2022 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae