Archetypes, Angels and Gaia
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12901427 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Lawrence Osborn (corresponding author) |
| Year | 2001 |
| Pages | 9-22 |
| Publication date | 2001-03-06 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal for the Study of Religion Nature and Culture (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1749-4907 • E-ISSN: 1749-4915 |
| Publisher | Equinox Publishing (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1558/ecotheology.v6i1.9 |
| OpenAlex | W2070019227 |
| Language | EN |
Since its formulation in the 1960s by James Lovelock, the Gaia hypothesis has, as Lawrence Joseph’s comprehensive summary indicates, fulfilled a wide variety of needs among environmentalists, feminists and New Agers. This very variety is a source of confusion and even conflict, with New Agers and self-proclaimed Gaian philosophers criticizing Lovelock for the conservatism of his interpretation
Archetype · Confusion · Conservatism · Environmental ethics · Epistemology · Interpretation (philosophy · Linguistics · Political science · Psychoanalysis · Theology · Variety (cybernetics · Computer Science · Earth Systems and Cosmic Evolution · History · Law · Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs · Philosophy · Psychology · Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life · Artificial Intelligence
| Highly cited | No |
|---|