Moral Regret in Mental Health Social Work

Dados Bibliográficos

ID12902174
AutoresDamien Robson (Vesuvius (United Kingdom), autor correspondente)
Ano2014
Volume8
Fascículo1
Páginas86-92
Data de publicação2014-01-02
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessNão
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoEthics and Social Welfare (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 1749-6535 • E-ISSN: 1749-6543
EditoraTaylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/17496535.2014.876264
OpenAlexW1996939797
IdiomaEN
Referências citadas18

This paper discusses ethical issues related to social work practice in the area of mental health. It does so via the use of a case study taken from my practice whilst I was on placement. Ethical issues are explored within a practice context that is becoming increasingly proceduralised and risk averse, and where protectionist responses contribute to undermining the rights of service users to self-determination. The paper explores the relationship between utilitarian and Kantian ethical theory and ethical decision-making as well as commenting on the usefulness of an anti-oppressive ethical perspective

Business · Context (archaeology · Engineering ethics · Environmental ethics · Ethical dilemma · Ethical issues · Ethical Leadership · Mental health · Mental health service · Perspective (graphical · Political science · Protectionism · Psychotherapist · Public relations · Regret · Sociology · Work (physics · Healthcare innovation and challenges · Homelessness and Social Issues · Law · Psychology · Social Psychology · Social Work Education and Practice · Social Work