Social Work and the Ethics of Involuntary Treatment for Anorexia Nervosa
A Postmodern Approach
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 12902189 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Sacha Kendall (Kendall College, autor de correspondencia), Richard Hugman (0000-0001-9988-6849, Russian State Agrarian Correspondence University, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2013 |
| Volumen | 7 |
| Número | 4 |
| Páginas | 310-325 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2013-09-06 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | No |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Ethics and Social Welfare (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 1749-6535 • E-ISSN: 1749-6543 |
| Editorial | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/17496535.2013.833275 |
| OpenAlex | W1989884866 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 2 |
| Referencias citadas | 42 |
The debate on the ethics of involuntary treatment for Anorexia Nervosa (AN) is dominated by biomedical ethics approaches to the issues. In keeping with the biomedical ethics emphasis on objectively balancing ethical principles, the debate centres on how to respect the autonomy of persons with AN who refuse treatment whilst protecting these persons from harm. Commentators discuss this at a normative ethics level. Thus, the debate does not address the moral relevance of how knowledge is constructed in the practice environment and the impact this has on how professional values are applied during treatment decision making. Social work ethics highlights the need for professionals to account for the authority of professional knowledge and for patients to participate in treatment decisions. However, in the practice environment, questioning medical hegemony and supporting patient participation, empowerment and self-determination (core social work values) is complicated by a lack of treatment efficacy, the high level of risk that patients present to themselves and uncertainty around the autonomy and competence of the patient to refuse treatment. This paper argues that postmodern ethics can support practitioners in managing these issues. In doing so, this paper makes a social work contribution to the debate
Anorexia nervosa · Applied ethics · Autonomy · Clinical social work · Competence (human resources · Eating disorders · Empowerment · Engineering ethics · Epistemology · Harm · Normative · Nursing ethics · Political science · Postmodernism · Psychiatry · Psychotherapist · Sociology · Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare · Ethics in medical practice · Law · Posthumanist Ethics and Activism · Psychology · Social Psychology · Social Work
The legitimation of the client and the profession
Ethics in professional life
Feeding Anorexia
Constructive Social Work
Transforming Social Work Practice
New Approaches in Ethics for the Caring Professions
Questioning Qualitative Inquiry
The quest for a universal social work
The individualized society
Professional Responsibility, Misconduct and Practical Reason
Reading Bauman for Social Work
Leave No Stone Unturned
Reflecting on Social Work
Constructing ‘the eating disordered patient’1
The Politics of Social Work Research
Social Work Practice in Mental Health
Social Work Theories and Methods
Moral Character in Social Work
Rethinking Empowerment
Moral Sources and Emergent Ethical Theories in Social Work
Virtue Ethics and Social Work
Professional Values and Ethics in Social Work
Accomplishing 'the case' in paediatrics and child health
| Obras citantes distintas | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 0,2 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2016 - 2016 (1) |
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 2 |