The monolingual framing of international education in Australia
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12906960 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Anthony J Liddicoat (0000-0002-2139-8471, University of South Australia, corresponding author), Jonathan Crichton (0000-0002-8054-4272, University of South Australia) |
| Year | 2008 |
| Volume | 2 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 367-384 |
| Publication date | 2008-12-11 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Sociolinguistic Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1750-8657 • E-ISSN: 1750-8649 |
| Publisher | Equinox Publishing (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1558/sols.v2i3.367 |
| OpenAlex | W1991009354 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 11 |
| References cited | 7 |
The concept of international education in Australia is moving from a discourse of attracting students from other countries to one of concern with internationalising curriculum and pedagogy. This internationalisation is motivated by a reconsideration of the appropriateness of curricula to prepare students for the globalised world of work. If one examines universities’ approaches to internationalisation, however, it becomes clear that the dominant ideology of internationalisation is framed from an English-speaking perspective in which English-language monolingualism is constructed as both the basis for and the content of teaching and learning. The monolingual mindset is characterised by: an emphasis on knowledge created in and communicated through English; little attention to the linguistic and cultural context in which knowledge will be used; neglect of the ‘non-English’ competences and capacities of learners and construction of learners’ English as a second language as a deficit and of English language learning as remediation; the ‘invisibility’ of the linguistic and cultural context of English; perceptions that education offered in the first language of students is suspect (easy options, low standards of teaching); and little consideration of knowledge and discipline practices as culturally and linguistically contexted. These characteristics demonstrate that internationalisation is discursively constructed as an English language phenomenon and the valued dimensions of international education are located within the value structures of English which determines the flow of knowledge, learning purposes and practices, academic values and the attribution of value to knowledge as a commodity
Curriculum · Framing (construction · Internationalization · Linguistics · Mindset · Multilingualism · Pedagogy · Sociology · Global Education and Multiculturalism · International Student and Expatriate Challenges · Second Language Learning and Teaching
What’s France got to do with it?
Indigenous Sovereignty and Multilingual Multiculturalism
Order and Crash
Making sense of being between languages and cultures
Expanding ‘conceptual horizons’
Language planning in universities
Encountering Language Difference in Australian Memoirs of Living in France
Multiplicity of Multilingualism as Represented in Linguistic Landscapes
Critical Thinking’ and Pedagogical Implications for Higher Education
Problematising English monolingualism in the ‘multicultural’ university
Translanguaging and “English Only” at Universities
Der monolinguale Habitus der multilingualen Schule
Advances in translating and adapting educational and psychological tests
International students and language support
Monolingualism
Asian students' reticence revisited
Why do many students appear reluctant to participate in classroom learning discourse
La distinction, critique sociale du jugement
| Unique citing works | 11 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,85 |
| Citation span | 2013 - 2026 (14) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 11 |