Asymmetric Competition on a New Battleground? Middle Eastern Perspectives on Sino-US Rivalry
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12907151 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Gangzheng She (0000-0001-6079-7873, Tsinghua University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 14 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 289-320 |
| Publication date | 2021-02-05 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The Chinese Journal of International Politics (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1750-8916 • E-ISSN: 1750-8924 |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1093/cjip/poab003 |
| OpenAlex | W3147453488 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 7 |
During the last few years, and especially since the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, growing number of Middle East scholars and analysts have been closely observing an escalation of tensions between China and the United States and their impact beyond bilateral ties. Considering the major differences of focus and approach among these observers, this article aims to review systematically such Middle Eastern perspectives, both globally and regionally, on the emerging Sino-US rivalry. Certain Middle East analysts regard Beijing and Washington as largely “homogeneous” extra-regional powers competing in international politics, economy, and technology. Many others emphasise their “heterogeneity,” arguing that the essence of Sino-US confrontation lies in the clash of two models. Most Middle East scholars note that, in contrast to Washington’s waning influence, Beijing’s growing presence in the region during the past decade has rendered the Middle East a “new battleground” for the two great powers. Although China and the United States still have shared interests in certain regional affairs, most intellectuals focus on and collectively identify five domains across the Middle East wherein Beijing and Washington are locked in asymmetric competition. In light of both the opportunities and challenges that the emerging Sino-US rivalry engenders, Middle Eastern observers raise various policy suggestions, and debate on whether regional players should proactively take advantage of this great power competition, cautiously hedge against strategic uncertainty and risk, or constructively help reduce hostility between the United States and the People’s Republic of China
Beijing · China · Competition (biology · Development economics · Diplomacy · East Asia · Economics · Economy · Middle East · Middle power · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Rivalry · Belt and Road Initiative · Global Political and Economic Relations · International Relations and Foreign Policy · Law
China's Post-United States Withdrawal Strategy in Afghanistan
Grand strategy and the construction of the national interest
Changing focus while maintaining balance
Navigating Middle Eastern Disputes
The interplay of China and Gulf countries in third-party market dynamics
China’s Partnership Diplomacy and the Formation of Gulf Regional Order
Chinese Archaeology in the Middle East
| Citations per year | 2.33 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2023 - 2025 (3) |
| Highly cited | No |