Will IR Theory with Chinese Characteristics be a Powerful Alternative
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12907266 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Hun Joon Kim (0000-0002-4389-8362, Institute of International Relations Prague, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2016 |
| Volume | 9 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 59-79 |
| Publication date | 2016-01-29 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The Chinese Journal of International Politics (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1750-8916 • E-ISSN: 1750-8924 |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1093/cjip/pov014 |
| OpenAlex | W2302946084 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 14 |
The study of International Relations in China has dramatically increased over the past 30 years. Scholars have now developed a Chinese School(s) of International Relations theory, or at least, International Relations theory with ‘Chinese characteristics’. This recent Chinese move is neither new nor the first attempt, but located within larger efforts to move away from Anglo-Saxon dominance within the International Relations discipline by localizing International Relations theory. From this standpoint, although there seem to be more problems than promises in recent Chinese attempts, we still cannot ignore the great potential of this initiative, first because the pace of change is so fast, second because the number of scholars working on the topic is ever increasing, and last, because the rise of China brings more frequent interactions between Chinese and Western International Relations scholars. All these factors provide extremely fertile ground for any lucky, timely seed of Chinese International Relations theory to germinate, flourish, and proliferate
Biology · China · Dominance (genetics · Geography · International relations · International relations theory · Pace · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Sociology · China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance · International Relations and Foreign Policy · Law
Forum
The State of the Discipline
The Resurgence of Ideology under Xi Jinping and International Relations Scholarship in China
South–South Knowledge Production and Hegemony
Global History with Chinese Characteristics
Understanding the Chinese Concept of “Holistic National Security”
"Las Teorías de las Relaciones internacionales con "características chinas
Chinese IR Sino-centrism tradition and its influence on the Chinese School Movement
The essentialisation of China in ‘Critical internationalisation studies’
Whither Chinese IR? The Sinocentric subject and the paradox of Tianxia-ism
On being Chinese and being complexified
Reconceptualizing International Order
Bridging Chinese Foreign Policy Studies and Foreign Policy Analysis
States of emergence, states of knowledge
| Citations per year | 1.56 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2017 - 2026 (10) |
| Highly cited | No |