China Debates the 'New Type of Great Power Relations
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12907282 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Qian Hao (0000-0002-0968-4483, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2015 |
| Volume | 8 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 349-370 |
| Publication date | 2015-11-17 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The Chinese Journal of International Politics (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1750-8916 • E-ISSN: 1750-8924 |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1093/cjip/pov012 |
| OpenAlex | W2261908420 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 11 |
The proposal to forge a ‘new type of great power relations’ is one of the most important diplomatic innovations this Chinese administration has made. Although popular in official discourse, Chinese scholars diverge greatly on how to define the new concept. Debates focus on who the great powers are and what the new relations feature. All are rooted in the vagueness of this concept in official discourse. As the official interpretation of the concept is changing, the debate is also narrowing to that of the goals of the new relations. However, the revision of this concept makes it less practical due to its disconnectedness with the reality of China–US relations. The revised expression also diminishes the uniqueness of the new relations proposal, which implies that it may no longer be a feasible guide to China–US relations or an effective framework for academic studies on the power transition between existing and established powers
China · Epistemology · Expression (computer science · International relations · Interpretation (philosophy · Law and economics · Linguistics · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Power (physics · Sociology · Vagueness · Computer Science · International Relations and Foreign Policy · Law · Philosophy
The Rise and Return of the Indo-Pacific
The Responsibility to Protect and the rise of China
China's New Multilateral Institutions
State capacity, economic statecraft, and markets
China’s new security concept
Cooperative, competitive and responsible
The Evolution of the Sino-Russian Oil and Gas Partnership
Three turns in the evolution of C hina– R ussia presidential pseudo‐alliance
China’s Ukraine Policy
China's pursuit of international status through negotiated deference
El retorno de la Trampa de Tucídides
| Citations per year | 1.1 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2016 - 2024 (9) |
| Highly cited | No |