Normative Overlaps between China and the Liberal International Society

When different entities (actors) accept a certain norm or a particular agreement about normative principles, they are likely to have an overlapping but not necessarily fully shared understanding of the given norm. This article theorises and assesses the strength of such normative overlaps in international politics. It conceptualises normative overlaps as normative congruences across and within political orders. It follows a norm’s connection to constitutional layers of political orders (congruences within orders) and the way these constitutional layers of political orders, among which the norm is shared, overlap (congruences across orders). To do so, it builds upon and interconnects the literature on norms, especially norm diffusion, and the English School and constructivist literature on the composition of international order. The theoretical framework is utilised to analyse how China fits into the liberal international society, especially when it comes to human rights (HR) and humanitarian protection. The effect of the normative overlaps in this realm is China’s active engagement with the liberal HR regime, however, without deeper convergence or socialisation. The limits of convergence are underpinned by significant differences between the Chinese developmentalist and liberal conceptions of the moral purpose of politics

China · Constructivism (international relations · Democracy · Human rights · International relations · Liberal democracy · Norm (philosophy · Normative · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Realm · Sociology · China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance · Global Peace and Security Dynamics · International Law and Human Rights · Law

• Can China’s Developmental Peace Be an Alternative to Liberal Peace? A Critical Feminist Interrogation

  Open Access•Yeonju Jung•Central European Journal of…•2024

  Add to list