The Aiib in the Liberal International Order

Dados Bibliográficos

ID12907384
AutoresMatthew D Stephens (0000-0001-6444-9593, Helmut Schmidt University, autor correspondente), Matthew D Stephen (International Relations at Helmut Schmidt University Hamburg and Senior Research Fellow at the GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies), Dan Skidmore (0000-0003-4955-1455, Drake University), David Skidmore (0000-0002-2547-3619, Political Science at Drake University, USA)
Ano2018
Volume12
Fascículo1
Páginas61-91
Data de publicação2018-12-21
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoThe Chinese Journal of International Politics (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 1750-8916 • E-ISSN: 1750-8924
EditoraOxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1093/cjip/poy021
OpenAlexW2917752221
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas33
Referências citadas16

The rise of China raises fundamental questions about the future of the liberal international order (LIO) at a time when it is under ever more strain. Although China’s focus for some years was on joining and participating in existing multilateral institutions, today China is increasingly building its own. Prominent among them is the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB), launched in late 2014. Against the background of contending theoretical expectations, this article examines the extent to which the AIIB either reinforces or challenges the LIO and highlights what this tells us about China’s broader relationship with the LIO. We provide a definition of the LIO that is based on its social purpose rather than on its formal characteristics. State-centric approaches offer insights into China’s decision to engage in new institution building via the AIIB, but we argue that a focus on social purpose is necessary to assess the AIIB’s broader implications for the LIO. We find that, while conforming in large measure to existing institutional models, the AIIB promotes China’s integration into global social networks, strengthens state-led development pathways, and is associated with the Chinese norm of non-interference. The AIIB, thus, foreshadows the possibility of an institutionalised international order indifferent to liberalism. In sum, the AIIB reflects the tensions between the socialising effects of the LIO and China’s growing externalisation of its own non-liberal, state-led model of political economy

China · Economics · Investment banking · Liberalism · Order (exchange · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Sociology · State (computer science · International Arbitration and Investment Law · International Development and Aid · International Relations and Foreign Policy · Law