The Politics of Power Projection
The Pivot to Asia, Its Failure, and the Future of American Primacy
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12907441 |
|---|---|
| Authors | P Harris (0000-0002-6909-8873, Colorado State University, corresponding author), Peter Trubowitz (0000-0003-2200-091X, London School of Economics and Political Science) |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 14 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 187-217 |
| Publication date | 2021-01-18 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The Chinese Journal of International Politics (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1750-8916 • E-ISSN: 1750-8924 |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1093/cjip/poab002 |
| OpenAlex | W3134572039 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
Why did the Obama administration's attempted pivot (or “rebalance”) to Asia fail? In this article, we argue that three interrelated domestic factors are to blame: hyper-partisanship in Washington, DC; the lack of a compelling foreign-policy narrative to make the pivot intelligible and attractive to a broad slice of the political class and domestic public; and the related failure to convince enough Americans that the pivot was necessary to boost their economic fortunes. These domestic stumbling blocks made it impossible for the Obama administration to invest US power assets toward a long-term programmatic endeavor in the Asia-Pacific. In making this argument about the domestic foundations of US power-projection, we improve upon existing explanations of the pivot's undoing that focus on international-level obstacles, problems with the pivot's design and implementation, or the unexpected election of Donald Trump as Obama's successor. We conclude by drawing implications for US power projection beyond the pivot and, indeed, beyond East Asia—suggesting that the US political system has become a weak foundation upon which to build any ambitious foreign-policy superstructure
Administration (probate law · Argument (complex analysis · Blame · Foreign policy · Law and economics · Narrative · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Power (physics · Sociology · Undoing · International Development and Aid · International Relations and Foreign Policy · Law · Public Administration
| Unique citing works | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1 |
| Citation span | 2022 - 2026 (5) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 4 |