Tradition, Identity and Scriptural Authority
Religious Inclusivism in the Writings of an Early Modern Sanskrit Intellectual
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12908402 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Jonathan Duquette (0000-0001-8211-1342, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2016 |
| Volume | 9 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Publication date | 2016-10-31 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Religions of South Asia (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1751-2689 • E-ISSN: 1751-2697 |
| Publisher | Equinox Publishing (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1558/rosa.v9i3.28338 |
| OpenAlex | W2545307042 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
It is commonly held that one of the distinguishing features of modern Hinduism is its all-inclusive tolerance and comprehensive openness for religious plurality. However, this universalism contrasts in important ways with the traditional inclusivism found in the writings of classical and medieval Indian brahminical thinkers. This article focuses on the inherent complexity and modalities of religious inclusivism in the early modern period. How was inclusivism construed and defended by Sanskrit intellectuals of this period? How do inclusivist models relate to broader concepts of identity, tradition and scriptures? An attempt is here made to answer these questions through examining the work of the sixteenth century scholar Appaya Diksita. Special attention will be paid to arguments he presents in his Sivarkamanidipika concerning the legitimacy of the Pancaratra tradition and the authority of Saivagamas
Aesthetics · Hinduism · Identity (music · Legitimacy · Linguistics · Openness to experience · Period (music · Political science · Sanskrit · Sociology · Universalism · History · Indian and Buddhist Studies · Indian History and Philosophy · Law · Philosophy · Psychology · Religious studies · Social Psychology · Study and Philosophy of Religion
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,2 |
| Citation span | 2021 - 2021 (1) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |