The Devil’s in the Details
How Countries’ Defamation Laws Can (and Can’t) Combat Hate Speech
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12909152 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Caitlin Ring Carlson (0000-0002-3286-2436, Seattle University, corresponding author), Christopher Terry (0000-0001-5639-051X, University of Minnesota) |
| Year | 2023 |
| Volume | 18 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 242-264 |
| Publication date | 2023-08-30 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journalism Practice (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1751-2786 • E-ISSN: 1751-2794 |
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/17512786.2023.2251976 |
| OpenAlex | W4386291939 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
| References cited | 33 |
Despite the multitude of efforts to combat hate speech, it persists within our global media discourse. It appears in legacy news media content, right-wing media outlets, and social media. In some countries, defamation laws are used to punish those who publish false, defamatory statements about a group defined by its racial, religious, or national origin, gender identity, or sexual orientation. Recognizing the potential role civil defamation laws can play in mitigating the problem of hate speech in media, this article offers a comparative legal analysis of existing defamation laws in Brazil, Germany, and the United States. The purpose of this inquiry is to determine whether and to what extent victims of hate speech might be able to employ these laws to seek justice. Our analysis indicates that criminal libel laws are often abused by political actors, and thus civil laws are preferred. Based on Germany's experience, we also find that social media platform compliance with this process is essential. Therefore, we propose a solution that expands U.S. libel law to include group defamation and uses carveouts to CDA Section 230 to motivate platform participation in identifying and removing group libel.KEYWORDS: Hate speechdefamationlibelcomparative analysisGermanyBrazilUnited Statesgroup libel Disclosure StatementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s)
Censorship · Economic Justice · Multitude · Political science · Politics · Publication · Sexual orientation · Sociology · Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies · Freedom of Expression and Defamation · Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection · Law
The Harm in Hate Speech
Beyond Breitbart
Hate Speech
On Commemorating Hrant Dink
Radical Right Movement Parties in Europe
International Libel and Privacy Handbook
Propaganda and Conflict
Racism, Hate Speech, and Social Media
Private Citizens and Public Discourse
Report and repeat
Anti-racism legislation in Brazil
The sociocognitive dimension of hate speech in readers’ comments on Serbian news websites
Do “Good Citizens” fight hate speech online? Effects of solidarity citizenship norms on user responses to hate comments
Covering Hate
You Don't Understand, This is a New War!” Analysis of Hate Speech in News Web Sites' Comments
Set Theory and Its Logic
Moral compass
The Rise of Hate Speech and Hate Crime Laws in Liberal Democracies
| Citations per year | 1.33 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2023 - 2026 (4) |
| Highly cited | No |