Legitimizing Wikipedia
How US national newspapers frame and use the online encyclopedia in their coverage
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12909307 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Marcus Messner (Russian State Agrarian Correspondence University, corresponding author), Jeff South |
| Year | 2010 |
| Volume | 5 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 145-160 |
| Publication date | 2010-09-15 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journalism Practice (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1751-2786 • E-ISSN: 1751-2794 |
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/17512786.2010.506060 |
| OpenAlex | W2319420621 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 16 |
| References cited | 33 |
Within only a few years, the collaborative online encyclopedia Wikipedia has become one of the most popular websites in the world. At the same time, Wikipedia has become the subject of much controversy because of inaccuracies and hoaxes found in some of its entries. Journalists, therefore, have remained skeptical about the reliability and accuracy of Wikipedia's information, despite the fact that research has consistently shown an overall high level of accuracy compared to traditional encyclopedia. This study analyzed the framing of Wikipedia and its use as a news source by five US national newspapers over an eight-year period. A content analysis of 1486 Wikipedia references in The New York Times, The Washington Post, The Wall Street Journal, USA Today and The Christian Science Monitor found that Wikipedia is framed predominantly neutral and positive, and that it is increasingly used as a news source. By framing Wikipedia as credible and accurate, the newspapers help legitimize the use of the online encyclopedia. By allowing Wikipedia to influence their news agendas as a source, the newspapers confirm the growing reliability of Wikipedia
Blogosphere · Encyclopedia · Framing (construction · Library science · Media studies · Newspaper · Political science · Skepticism · Sociology · The Internet · World Wide Web · Computer Science · History · Social Media and Politics · Web and Library Services · Wikis in Education and Collaboration
Making news funny
Towards more balanced news access? A study on the impact of cost-cutting and Web 2.0 on the mediated public sphere
From Social Media with News
News Consumer Perceptions of New Journalistic Sourcing Techniques
The Familiarity Paradox
Genre Uptake as Boundary-Work
Análisis de la cobertura de la Wikipedia en la prensa hispanohablante entre los años 2013 y 2023
Wikipedia
Wiki-worthy
Wikipedia as a space for discursive constructions of globalization
Not all Wikipedias are the same
Tweets and Source Diversity
Wikipedia versus Encyclopedia Britannica
It’s not an encyclopedia, it’s a market of agendas
Evolution of Wikipedia’s medical content
Debating Veganism
Democracy And The News
The Content Analysis Guidebook
Internet encyclopaedias go head to head
TV News Sources and News Channels
Source effects in communication and persuasion research
Agenda Setting and International News
Women Making News
Media Credibility Reconsidered
Agenda-setting and the internet
Agenda-setting
The Structure of News Sources on Television
An Analysis of Topical Coverage of Wikipedia
What's on Wikipedia, and What's Not
The Source Cycle
A Cook, a Cardinal, His Priests, and the Press
A Look at Agenda-setting
The Evolution of Agenda-Setting Research
Cable Television News Viewed as Most Credible
Influences on Use of Sources at Large U.S. Newspapers
Reliability of Content Analysis
The Influence of Source Credibility on Communication Effectiveness
Two Levels of Agenda Setting Among Advertising and News in the 1995 Spanish Elections
News as Framing
| Unique citing works | 16 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,23 |
| Citation span | 2013 - 2025 (13) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 16 |