More local than global
Rethinking sovereign wealth and state capitalism in Saudi Arabia, Kazakhstan, and Malaysia
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 12911008 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Gene Lim (0000-0001-9083-8883, National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies), Guanie Lim (National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies), Linda Yin-nor Tjia (0000-0001-7442-0217, City University of Hong Kong, autor de correspondencia), Wellington N K Aweke (Ministry of Finance) |
| Año | 2026 |
| Páginas | 1-17 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2026-03-25 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Journal of Asian Public Policy (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 1751-6242 • E-ISSN: 1751-6234 |
| Editorial | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/17516234.2026.2648070 |
| OpenAlex | W7140318615 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Referencias citadas | 22 |
The Public Investment Fund (PIF) of Saudi Arabia has gained prominence in Middle Eastern and global markets through high-profile projects such as the futuristic city of Neom and the acquisition of English football club Newcastle United. These initiatives have drawn international attention to the PIF’s expanding scale and scope of activities, prompting debates over market distortions abroad and governance, accountability, and social justice at home. Similar apprehensions also surround newer sovereign wealth funds, such as Kazakhstan’s Samruk-Kazyna and Malaysia’s Sarawak Sovereign Wealth Future Fund, concerning the extent to which home-country geopolitical considerations may shape their overseas investments. Examining case material on the PIF, Samruk-Kazyna, and the Sarawak Sovereign Wealth Future Fund, this paper argues that the rise of these funds since the 2008 global financial crisis has signalled increased willingness and capacity of governments to intervene in their economies. It further argues that, despite those states’ role in directing national and international investment strategies, these funds primarily serve domestic political and economic objectives rather than any coherent geopolitical ambitions: for Saudi Arabia, the PIF is closely intertwined with Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman’s domestic political agenda; for the other two funds, they focus on strengthening national capacity for economic resilience.
Capitalism · Sovereign wealth fund · Sovereignty · State (computer science · State capitalism · Elite Sociology and Global Capitalism · Socioeconomic Development in MENA · State Capitalism and Financial Governance
Political Analysis
No African country is Norway! A perspective on sovereign wealth funds and the energy transition
Money power of Capital and Production of ‘New State Spaces’
State capital in a geoeconomic world
Tools of regime stability
Financial geography I
The politics of state capitalism in a post-liberal international order
Kazakhstan’s leverage and economic diversification amid Chinese connectivity dreams
The strange geographies of the 'new' state capitalism
Sovereign Wealth in Abu Dhabi
The Strategic Logics of State Investment Funds in Asia
State capitalism, capitalist statism
Institutional Re(turns) and the Strategic - Relational Approach
Sovereign wealth funds and national security
The Geopolitics of Sovereign Wealth Funds
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
|---|---|
| Altamente citado | No |