Neuroscience and Education – an Incompatible Relationship
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 12912486 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Alka Sehgal Cuthbert (University of Cambridge, autor correspondente) |
| Ano | 2015 |
| Volume | 9 |
| Fascículo | 1 |
| Páginas | 49-61 |
| Data de publicação | 2015-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Sociology Compass (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 1751-9020 • E-ISSN: 1751-9020 |
| Editora | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/soc4.12233 |
| OpenAlex | W1539256620 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 2 |
| Referências citadas | 55 |
To date, there has been little opposition to the growing influence of cognitive neuroscience in education from the education profession itself. However there is growing criticism from the fields of psychology and philosophy. This paper aims to summarize the central arguments found in literature critical of the claims made by cognitive neuroscientists who advocate its potential to improve education. The paper is organized around three sections which draw together assessments from psychology, philosophy and sociology of education. The first, “Brain, Mind and Culture,” lays out the general argument against neuro‐education and evaluates two common assumptions made by advocates of neuro‐education: that there is a causal relationship between brain and mind and that learning is a central tenet of education. The second section, “Promises and Problems,” critically considers an example of neuro‐educational research and then goes on to discuss how neuro‐education has detrimental consequences for two necessary conditions of liberal subject‐based education; disciplinarity and pedagogic authority. The final section, “Discourses of Risk, Vulnerability and Optimal Outcomes,” considers wider sociological literature to locate neuro‐education within its contemporary cultural context. The paper concludes with a summary of the main philosophical and moral objections to neuro‐education
Argument (complex analysis · Cognition · Context (archaeology · Criticism · Epistemology · Higher education · Opposition (politics · Philosophy of education · Political science · Politics · Social science · Sociology · Law · Neuroscience · Neuroscience, Education and Cognitive Function · Psychology
Reclaiming Knowledge
Towards a Theory of Educational Transmissions
Parenting Culture Studies
Aping Mankind
The Seductive Allure of Neuroscience Explanations
Four essays on liberty
Why Knowledge Matters in Curriculum
Bringing Knowledge Back In
Education and neuroscience
Blinded by neuroscience
Screen and intervene’
Why General Education? Peters, Hirst and History
Principles of Learning, Implications for Teaching
Does Dyslexia Exist
Education
Self‐Esteem
Data Return
Neuroscience and Education
Was Peters Nearly Right About Education
Post‐welfarism and the reconstruction of teachers’ work in the UK
Fear and Security
Makeover Or Takeover? The strange death of educational autonomy in neo-liberal England
Knowledge and the Curriculum in the Sociology of Education
Education and the Brain
Connecting Education and Cognitive Neuroscience
Introduction to Symposium on Globalisation
Professional Trust
Intellectuals or Technicians? The Urgent Role of Theory in Educational Studies
The teacher's soul and the terrors of performativity
The birth of the neuromolecular gaze
Neuroscience and education
Art and Neuroscience
Situated Learning
| Obras citantes distintas | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 0,5 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2022 - 2023 (2) |
| Velocidade de citação | historical |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 2 |