Privacy violations and procedural justice in the United States prisons and jails
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12912965 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Sydney Ingel (0000-0002-5686-4436, George Mason University, corresponding author), Arden Richards‐karamarkovich (0009-0002-9195-3802, George Mason University), Stephanie Bietsch (George Mason University), Danielle S Rudes (0000-0002-0439-5762, George Mason University) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 15 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Publication date | 2020-12-26 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Sociology Compass (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1751-9020 • E-ISSN: 1751-9020 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/soc4.12847 |
| OpenAlex | W3114755119 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 8 |
| References cited | 38 |
Through constitutional amendments and case law, the United States citizens receive privacy protections. These same protections do not exist for individuals incarcerated in prisons and jails. Instead, their privacy rights are regularly replaced by larger institutional concerns for security, safety, and control. Such privacy violation measures may include electronic surveillance, recording of phone calls, opening/reading of mail, and searches of their person, cell, and property. Although it is expected that incarcerated individuals have fewer privacy rights than nonincarcerated citizens, some privacy violations may be perceived as procedurally unjust due to their severity and infringement upon incarcerated individuals' rights to dignity and respect. This has implications for the well‐being of incarcerated individuals, the legitimacy of correctional officers, and as a result, the potential safety and security of institutions
Business · Criminology · Dignity · Economic Justice · Information privacy · Internet privacy · Legitimacy · Phone · Political science · Politics · Privacy laws of the United States · Privacy Rights · Right to privacy · Sociology · Crime Patterns and Interventions · Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis · Law · Policing Practices and Perceptions
Pulled Over
Distinctions and distinctiveness in the work of prison officers
Procedural Justice, Anger, and Prisoners’ Misconduct
Procedural Justice and Order Maintenance Policing
Public Satisfaction With Police
Procedural justice, legitimacy, and prisoner misconduct
The Effect of Police Body-Worn Cameras on Use of Force and Citizens’ Complaints Against the Police
Women on Parole
CCTV, school surveillance and social control
The impact of distributive and procedural justice on correctional staff job stress, job satisfaction, and organizational commitment
Friend or foe? Race, age, and inmate perceptions of inmate-staff relations
The relationship among distributive and procedural justice and correctional life satisfaction, burnout, and turnover intent
Enhancing Police Legitimacy
Profiling and Police Legitimacy
Shaping Citizen Perceptions of Police Legitimacy
The Exercise of Power in Coercive Organizations
The Society of Captives
Race, Institutional Rule Breaking, and Disciplinary Response
Procedural justice and prison violence
Just Duck
Supermax as a Technology of Punishment
Privacy and procedural justice in organizations
| Unique citing works | 8 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 2 |
| Citation span | 2022 - 2026 (5) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 8 |