Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Exactitude is truth

Representing the British military through commissioned artworks

Bibliographic Data

ID12914549
AuthorsPaul Gough (0000-0003-4480-576X, corresponding author)
Year2008
Volume1
Issue3
Pages341-356
Publication date2008-12-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of War and Culture Studies (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1752-6272 • E-ISSN: 1752-6280
PublisherRoutledge (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1386/jwcs.1.3.341_1
OpenAlexW2042815440
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited2

The work of ‘regimental artists’ is often derided for being jingoistic, irrelevant and predicated on anachronistic representational strategies rooted in high-Victorian battle painting. Despite their marginal status, a core of professional painters today work regularly for the British armed services to record, and occasionally commemorate, contemporary and past feats of arms, as well as more mundane public service duties such as ceremonial display and ‘Keeping the Army in the Public Eye’ (KAPE) tours. \n \nTheir work is largely unseen by the non-military public, largely because it is intended for a closed community of serving soldiers, their families, and veterans who are associated with the unit. Yet, as a sizeable contemporary body of art work, it contributes to the commemorative rhetoric of the British military and employs a number of artists of national standing. \n \nDrawing on the author’s own experiences as a several-times commissioned military artist, this paper is a ‘work-in-progress’ that examines the work of several painters – John Ross, Ken Howard, and Keith Holmes – who have worked intermittently for the British armed services in the past three decades. But the paper will takes as its principle working case-study the work of painter David Rowlands, commissioned in the 1990s by the Permanent Joint Headquarters (UK) as their official artist to record the British build-up in the Arabian Gulf, and since then fully employed by units in the British army (and some overseas military units) to paint commemorative works related to active service overseas, largely in Iraq and more recently Afghanistan. \n \nThrough an examination of Rowlands’ work, the paper touches upon the formal language of military painting, particularly the tensions between illustration and interpretation, between factual and technical accuracy, and examines the issues of authenticity and historical verity. The paper also touches upon issues of agency and reception, and the stresses between the commissioning process, the independence of the artist as interpreter, and broader concerns of testimony and visual authority

Anachronism · Archaeology · Art · Battle · Military history · Military service · Painting · Political science · Politics · Visual arts · Work (physics · Engineering · History · Law · Military History and Strategy · Military, Security, and Education Studies

  • Chronotopes in the scopic regime of sovereignty

    Desmond Manderson•Visual Studies•2017

  • Regarding the pain of others

    Susan Sontag•Diogène•2003

  • The Great War and Modern Memory

    Paul Fussell•The SHAFR Guide Online•2017

Citations per year0.11
Citation span2017 - 2017 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae