Regime Consolidation through Transitional Justice in Europe

The Cases of Germany, Spain and Turkey

Bibliographic Data

ID12915374
AuthorsAnja Mihr (0000-0001-6782-2234, corresponding author)
Year2017
Volume11
Issue1
Pages113-131
Publication date2017-02-16
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational Journal of Transitional Justice (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1752-7716 • E-ISSN: 1752-7724
PublisherOxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1093/ijtj/ijx003
OpenAlexW2591193286
LanguageEN
Citations received3

Transitional justice (TJ) measures in post-Second World War Europe illustrate how they consolidate political regimes in both autocratic and democratic ways. TJ measures can work as catalysts during transition (regime change) and transformation (regime consolidation) periods to help build either exclusive autocratic societies or inclusive democratic ones. In this article I look at how policy makers use TJ measures such as trials, reparations, vetting procedures and even amnesty laws and memorials to, on the one hand, establish an exclusive and thus selective bias and often arbitrary political regimes and, on the other hand, establish an inclusive, diverse and pluralistic political regime. I test how TJ measures as independent variables correlate with institution building after the end of dictatorships or conflict and thus impact on political regime consolidation as the dependent variable in the cases of postwar Germany, post-dictatorial Spain and Turkey in the second half of the 20th century

Autocracy · Consolidation (business · Democracy · Democratic consolidation · Democratization · Dictatorship · Economic system · Economics · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Regime change · Transitional justice · Vetting · Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics · Italian Fascism and Post-war Society · Turkey's Politics and Society · Law

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub