The Anatomy of Apology and Forgiveness
Towards Transformative Apology and Forgiveness
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12915501 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Joram Tarusarira (0000-0003-3235-683X, University of Groningen, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2019 |
| Volume | 13 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 206-224 |
| Publication date | 2019-03-12 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International Journal of Transitional Justice (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1752-7716 • E-ISSN: 1752-7724 |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1093/ijtj/ijz006 |
| OpenAlex | W2936162672 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 18 |
| References cited | 2 |
The central thesis of this article is that while apology and forgiveness are vital for dealing with a violent past, there is a need to critically transform the sociopolitical epistemic subjectivities that underpin a wrongdoing. These include political discourses, narratives, ideas and ideologies that justified the wrongdoing in the first place and are thus its bedrock. This is against the understanding that brutality and violence are sustained by particular epistemologies, logics and reasonings. Failure to bring about their transformation results in not stopping the repetition of brutality and not realizing sustainable reconciliation, as well as stifling key aspects of dealing with the past, such as truth seeking, truth telling, justice and accountability. By drawing on the state-sponsored massacres in Matabeleland and Midlands provinces in Zimbabwe in the early 1980s – the Gukurahundi massacres – this article argues that current calls for, and implementations of, apologies and forgiveness are often undertaken without considering the need to transform the epistemic bedrock of conflict and violence which engenders apology and forgiveness. This lack of focus on transformation makes apology and forgiveness susceptible to abuse or underutilization, and thus impotent in facilitating sustainable reconciliation. The article emphasizes the need to transform the cognitive and epistemic subjectivities underpinning wrongdoing, thus making a case for transformative apology and forgiveness
Epistemology · Forgiveness · Ideology · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Transformative learning · Transitional justice · Wrongdoing · African studies and sociopolitical issues · Migration, Refugees, and Integration · Law · Philosophy
Material Perspectives on Religion, Conflict, and Violence
Transforming Justice Responses to Non-Recent Institutional Abuses
Recovery Strategies of a Micro Restaurant in Nigeria
Historical truth, accountability and change in the (post-)colonial state
Belgium’s “Truth Commission” on its overseas colonial legacy
Recognition, redress or window dressing? On the transformative potential of historical reports and apologies for the Dutch slavery past
Closing chapters of the past? Rhetorical strategies in political apologies for human rights violations across the world
Thick accountability in contemporary justice struggles
Acts of contrition
I needed him to tell the world”
Disruptive Reparations? Tunisia's Victim Regions and the Collective Reparations Dilemma in Transitional Societies
Can spirits play a role in peace and reconciliation projects? Perspectives on traditional reconciliation in Zimbabwe
State apologies, postcolonial resistance and ontological insecurity
Intimate racism from one's partner in young intercultural couples
The Zemiological Afterlife of Wrongful Conviction
When Piety Is Not Enough
Religion and the Study of Peace
Presbyterians, Forgiveness, and Dealing with the Past in Northern Ireland
| Unique citing works | 18 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 3 |
| Citation span | 2020 - 2026 (7) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 18 |