Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Overlapping consensus view of human rights

A Rawlsian conception

Bibliographic Data

ID12915910
AuthorsRanjoo Seodu Herr (0000-0003-3684-3686, Bentley University, corresponding author)
Year2022
Volume15
Issue1
Pages1-23
Publication date2022-10-21
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational Theory (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1752-9719 • E-ISSN: 1752-9727
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s1752971922000124
OpenAlexW4306983601
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited49

This paper advances and defends the overlapping consensus view of human rights (OCV) as a political conception of human rights most consistent with John Rawls's normative account of a realistic utopia at the international level. Although some clues exist in The Law of Peoples to support this view, an innovative reconstruction is called for to complete the picture. This paper aims to offer such a reconstruction, which is predicated on two premises: first, the parties to the international original positions, which include decent nonliberal peoples (DNPs), are reasonable and worthy of liberal toleration; and, second, the protection of human rights proper is a module that can fit into all acceptable comprehensive doctrines at the international level, including societal comprehensive doctrines in DNPs. The first premise has been subjected to vehement liberal critiques and left for dead, and the second premise has not been taken seriously and relatively neglected. This paper defends these premises in turn to justify the OCV as constitutive of Rawls's normative account of a realistic utopia at the international level

Epistemology · Human rights · Law and economics · Normative · Political science · Politics · Premise · Sociology · Toleration · Utopia · Law · Philosophy · Political Philosophy and Ethics · Religion and Society Interactions · War, Ethics, and Justification

  • Liberal nationalism and Central American refugees

    Open Access•Ranjoo Seodu Herr•Nations and Nationalism•2023

  • The great theft

    Khaled Abou El Fadl•The great theft•2005

  • Hardwired Behavior

    Open Access•Laurence R Tancredi, Laurence Tancredi•Hardwired Behavior•2005

  • Justice as Fairness

    John Rawls, Erin Kelly•Justice As Fairness•2001

  • Between Feminism and Islam

    Zakia Salime•Between feminism and Islam•2011

  • The weirdest people in the world?

    Open Access•J Henrich, Steven J Heine et al.•Behavioral and Brain Sciences•2010

  • Self and Social Identity

    Naomi Ellemers, Russell Spears et al.•Annual Review of Psychology•2002

  • Political Authority and Human Rights

    Open Access•David A Reidy•Rawls's Law of Peoples•2006

  • Rawls's Narrow Doctrine of Human Rights

    Open Access•Alistair M Macleod•Rawls's Law of Peoples•2006

  • Why Rawls is Not a Cosmopolitan Egalitarian

    Open Access•Leif Wenar•Rawls's Law of Peoples•2006

  • Justice, Legitimacy, and Self-Determination

    Allen Buchanan, Allen E Buchanan•Justice, legitimacy, and…•2003

  • National Responsibility and Global Justice

    David Miller, David Leslie Miller•National Responsibility and…•2007

  • Islam and the Challenge of Human Rights

    Abdulaziz Sachedina, Abdulaziz Abdulhussein Sachedina•Islam and the challenge of human…•2009

  • Rawls's Law of Peoples

    Charles R Beitz•Ethics•2000

  • The Incoherence Between Rawls’s Theories of Justice

    Thomas Pogge, Thomas W Pogge•Rawls and Law•2017

  • A Theory of Justice

    Open Access•John Rawls•Theory of Justice•1999

  • The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements

    David A Snow, Sarah Anne Soule et al.•Blackwell Companion to Social…•2004

  • Rawls on Global Distributive Justice

    Open Access•Joseph Heath•Canadian Journal of Philosophy…•2005

  • Toward an Islamic Reformation

    Abdullahi Ahmed An-Na‘im•Toward an Islamic Reformation•2019

  • Primates and Philosophers

    Frans De Waal, FransHG de Waal et al.•Primates and Philosophers•2006

  • The Cambridge Companion to Rawls

    Open Access•Samuel Richard Freeman, Thomas H Nagel et al.•The Cambridge companion to Rawls•2002

  • Darwin's Cathedral

    D S Wilson•Darwin's Cathedral•2002

  • Moral, Believing Animals

    Christian Smith•Moral, Believing Animals•2003

  • Politics of Piety

    Saba Mahmood•Politics of Piety•2011

  • Cosmopolitanism and the Law of Peoples

    Open Access•Simon Caney•Journal of Political Philosophy•2002

  • Minimalism About Human Rights

    Open Access•Joshua Cohen•Journal of Political Philosophy•2004

  • The Rawlsian Theory of International Law

    Open Access•Fernando R Tesón•Ethics & International Affairs•1995

  • Islamist Women's Agency and Relational Autonomy

    Open Access•Ranjoo Seodu Herr•Hypatia•2018

  • Rethinking Relational Autonomy

    Open Access•Andrea C Westlund•Hypatia•2009

  • Deformed Desires and Informed Desire Tests

    Open Access•Anita M Superson, Anita Superson•Hypatia•2005

  • Gender Inequality and Cultural Differences

    Open Access•Susan Moller Okin•Political Theory•1994

  • Personal Autonomy in Society

    Open Access•Philip Parvin, Philip E Parvin•Contemporary Political Theory•2007

  • Women and Human Development

    Open Access•Martha C Nussbaum, Martha Nussbaum•Women and Human Development•2000

  • A new Big Five

    Dan P Mcadams, Jennifer L Pals•American Psychologist•2006

  • Preschool children and chimpanzees incur costs to watch punishment of antisocial others

    Open Access•Natacha Mendes, Nikolaus Steinbeis et al.•Nature Human Behaviour•2017

  • Human Rights as a Common Concern

    Open Access•Charles R Beitz•American Political Science Review•2001

Citations per year0.33
Citation span2023 - 2023 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae