Theorizing the history of women's international thinking at the ‘end of international theory’
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12916045 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Patricia Owens (0000-0001-7530-463X, University of Oxford, corresponding author), Sarah C Dunstan (0000-0002-4576-0156, University of Oxford), Kimberly Hutchings (0000-0003-3027-7337, University of Oxford), Katharina Rietzler (0000-0002-7932-8863, University of Oxford) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 14 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 388-393 |
| Publication date | 2022-09-13 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International Theory (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1752-9719 • E-ISSN: 1752-9727 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s1752971922000070 |
| OpenAlex | W4295338494 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 31 |
Throughout the 20 th century, women were leading intellectuals on International Relations (IR). They thought, wrote, and taught on this subject in numerous political, professional, intimate, and intellectual contexts. They wrote some of the earliest and most powerful theoretical statements of what would later become core approaches to contemporary international theory. Yet, historical women, those working before the late 20 th century, are almost completely missing in IR's intellectual and disciplinary histories, including histories of its main theoretical traditions. In this forum, leading historians and theorists of IR respond to the recent findings of the Leverhulme project on Women and the History of International Thought (WHIT), particularly its first two book-length publications on the centrality of women to early IR discourses and subsequent erasure from its history and conceptualization. The forum is introduced by members of the WHIT project. Collectively, the essays suggest the implications of the erasure and recovery of women's international thought are significant and wide-ranging
Conceptualization · Discipline · Epistemology · Intellectual history · International relations · International relations theory · Library science · Political science · Politics · Social science · Sociology · Subject (documents · Gender Studies · Gender, Security, and Conflict · Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics · Historical Gender and Feminism Studies · Law · Philosophy
The Gender of History
Thinkers of the Twenty Years’ Crisis
Theorizing (with) Amy Ashwood Garvey
Women's International Thought
Race Women Internationalists
White World Order, Black Power Politics
U.S. Foreign Policy Think Tanks and Women’s Intellectual Labor, 1920–1950
Women's International Thought and the New Professions, 1900–1940
Claudia Jones, International Thinker
Feminism, War and the Prospects for Peace
Why International Relations has Failed as an Intellectual Project and What to do About it
Women, wars, and world affairs
Turning International
South Africa, race and the making of International Relations
The Anglo-American Tradition in Foreign Affairs
Women Thinkers and the Canon of International Thought
Worldmaking after Empire
A Century of International Relations Feminism
The end of International Relations theory
Leaving theory behind
Women and the History of International Thought
Whose international is it anyway? Women's peace activists as International Relations theorists
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |