When may soldiers participate in war
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12916137 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Uwe Steinhoff (0000-0001-5805-6945, University of Hong Kong, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2016 |
| Volume | 8 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 236-261 |
| Publication date | 2016-04-22 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International Theory (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1752-9719 • E-ISSN: 1752-9727 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s1752971916000051 |
| OpenAlex | W2336527110 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 39 |
I shall argue that in some wars both sides are (as a collective) justified, that is, they can both satisfy valid jus ad bellum requirements. Moreover, in some wars – but not in all – the individual soldiers on the unjustified side (i.e. on the side without jus ad bellum ) may nevertheless kill soldiers (and also civilians as a side-effect) on the justified side, even if the enemy soldiers always abide by jus in bello constraints. The reason for this is that with regard to some forms of inflicting harm on others one may give special weight to one’s own interests and the interests of those to whom one has special responsibilities when assessing the proportionality of those acts. That is, the proportionality calculation may be agent-relative. This is in particular so in the case of foreseeably preventing innocent and non-threatening people from being saved (for instance, by shooting down a tactical bomber who would have saved them by destroying an ammunitions factory) but less so in the case of the intentional or foreseeable direct harming of innocent and non-threatening people (dropping bombs on people standing near an ammunitions factory). In the light of these considerations, I will then answer the question as to when soldiers may justifiably participate in war (and when not)
Adversary · Computer security · Factory (object-oriented programming · Guard (computer science · Harm · Jus ad bellum · Just war theory · Law and economics · Political science · Proportionality (law · Sociology · Spanish Civil War · Computer Science · Free Will and Agency · Law · Torture, Ethics, and Law · War, Ethics, and Justification
Just and Unjust Wars
Samuelis Pufendorfij De jure naturae et gentium libri octo.
Cosmopolitan War
Killing in War
The Ends of HarmThe Moral Foundations of Criminal Law
The Basis of Moral Liability to Defensive Killing
Against Equal Respect and Concern, Equal Rights, and Egalitarian Impartiality
Do All Persons Have Equal Moral Worth?
Encyclopedia of Violence, Peace, and Conflict
War-Pacifism
Why We Shouldn’t Reject Conflicts
Debate
On Following Orders in an Unjust War
Rethinking criminal law
Just and Unjust Wars
Self‐Defense and Defense of Others
How We Fight
| Citations per year | 0.5 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2024 - 2024 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |