The evolution of family policy in South Korea
From Confucian familism to Neo‐familism
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 12916618 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Dayoon Lee (0000-0001-7274-7283, Seoul National University, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2018 |
| Volumen | 12 |
| Número | 1 |
| Páginas | 46-53 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2018-02-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Asian Social Work and Policy Review (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 1753-1403 • E-ISSN: 1753-1411 |
| Editorial | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/aswp.12137 |
| OpenAlex | W2792584163 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 29 |
| Referencias citadas | 12 |
The aim of this article is to trace the trajectory of family policy development in South Korea from the 1940s to the present. Changes to family intervention are analyzed in terms of the settings of policy instruments, the policy instruments themselves, and policy goals (or policy regimes). Consequently, two critical turning points are identified: the late 1980s and the early 2000s. The first period (1945–1988) was an era of embryonic Korean family policy when family intervention was limited and indirect based on Confucian familism. During the second period (1998–2003), explicit family policies emerged, but the Korean government kept family intervention to a minimum; maintained a division of roles between the state, the market, and families (the state as the regulator and the market/families as the providers); and maintained patriarchal family relations and gendered family roles based on Confucian familism. However, the third period (2003–2016) shows the explosive expansion of family policies and changes in policy goals and regimes based on Neo‐familism, which emphasizes democratic and equal gender relations within families and a family‐friendly/supportive society
Democracy · Family life · Intervention (counseling · Political science · Politics · Social policy · Sociology · State (computer science · State policy · Gender Studies · Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving · Law · Medicine · Social Policy and Reform Studies · Work-Family Balance Challenges
Old-age Care Responsibilities in China’s National Five-year Plans (2001—2025)
Forgotten Concepts of Korea’s Welfare State
Empresarios y régimen de bienestar
The role of victim sensitivity between anti-welfare dependence attitude and mental health of older adults in China
Temporal associations between depressive symptoms, self-esteem, and satisfaction with family life
Beyond birth rates
Informal Networks, Informal Institutions, and Social Exclusion in the Workplace
What do you think and feel about getting older
The impact of college education on women’s fertility
Beyond the layout
Child‐related family policies in East and Southeast Asia
Intergenerational solidarity in a developing welfare state
Understanding South Korean Immigrant Adolescents' Experiences of Staying Home Alone
Community Capitals Associated with Social Isolation among Korean Young Adults
The public and private mix in the production of childcare
Gender Differences in the Impact of Intergenerational Support on Depressive Symptoms among Older Adults in Korea
Korea on the edge
Three generations on a holiday
The complementary roles between clientelism and familism in social policy development
How policy configurations matter
Retirement pathways and pension inequality in China
Reappraisal of the political approach on East Asian welfare state development
The evolving Korean childcare regime
Les politiques pronatalistes à Taïwan et en Corée du Sud
The multidimensionality of childcare policy change
Swapping Gender Traditionalism
Development journalism and revitalisation of familism in Malaysia
Family Policies in Low Fertility Countries
Young Generation's Perceptions of Same-Sex Sexuality and Attitudes Toward Same-Sex Marriage in South Korea
Gender and Welfare States in East Asia
Welfare Capitalism in East Asia
New Perspectives on the Welfare State in Europe
The Politics of Investing in Families
Women Reconciling Paid and Unpaid Work in a Confucian Welfare State
A Confucian War over Childcare? Practice and Policy in Childcare and Their Implications for Understanding the Korean Gender Regime
Diverging Paths? A Comparative Look at Childcare Policies in J apan, S outh K orea and T aiwan
Social Policy in South Korea
South Korea under Compressed Modernity
Beyond East Asian welfare productivism in South Korea
Policy Paradigms, Social Learning, and the State
| Obras citantes distintas | 29 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 4,83 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2020 - 2026 (7) |
| Velocidad de citación | current |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 28 |