Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Trade uncertainty in US and China on trade openness in Sub-Saharan Africa

Bibliographic Data

ID12917762
AuthorsWitness Nyasha Bandura (0000-0003-1311-312X, University of South Africa, corresponding author)
Year2021
Volume15
Issue1
Pages49-59
Publication date2021-12-08
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueChina Economic Journal (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1753-8963 • E-ISSN: 1753-8971
PublisherRoutledge (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/17538963.2021.2014703
OpenAlexW4200416020
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited21

This study applies the system GMM technique to determine the impact of external trade uncertainty on trade openness for 35 countries in Sub-Saharan Africa, over the period 1985–2019 with 5-year non-overlapping data. Given the rapid globalisation and episodes of global economic uncertainty over the recent years, the research attempts to identify if trade uncertainty from outside of the region could affect trade openness in the region. There is strong evidence of a negative impact of trade uncertainty from both China, the US and the world on trade in Sub-Saharan Africa. The negative impact is, however, more severe from the world and followed by China. Comparatively, it can be concluded that China is more influential on Africa’s trade as compared to the US. It is, therefore, recommended that African economies should be concerned with trade uncertainty from around the world and put in place some measures to safeguard their economies

Bilateral trade · China · Commercial policy · Economic integration · Economics · Free trade · Geography · Globalization · International economics · International trade · Openness to experience · Safeguard · Trade barrier · World trade · Energy, Environment, Economic Growth · Global trade and economics · Market Dynamics and Volatility

  • How would legal systems affect US and Chinese foreign direct investment in Africa? An exploration of the roles of origins, customary law, and legal integration

    Zhijun Gao, Yi Feng et al.•China Economic Journal•2024

  • Policy Uncertainty, Trade, and Welfare

    Kyle Handley, Nuno Limão•American Economic Review•2017

  • GMM Estimation with persistent panel data

    Richard Blundell, Stephen Bond•Econometric Reviews•2000

  • How to do Xtabond2

    Open Access•David Roodman•The Stata Journal: Promoting…•2009

  • Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data

    Manuel Arellano, Stephen Bond•The Review of Economic Studies•1991

  • Measuring Economic Policy Uncertainty

    Scott Baker, Scott R Baker et al.•The Quarterly Journal of Economics•2016

  • Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models

    Open Access•Richard Blundell, Stephen Bond•Journal of Econometrics•1998

  • Trade and Uncertainty

    Open Access•Dennis Novy, Alastair M Taylor et al.•The Review of Economics and…•2020

  • Does trade policy related uncertainty affect international trade? Evidence from the US-China commodity trade

    Serdar Ongan, İsmet Göçer•China Economic Journal•2020

  • A Note on the Theme of Too Many Instruments

    Open Access•David Roodman•Oxford Bulletin of Economics and…•2009

  • Brexit Uncertainty and Trade Disintegration

    Open Access•Alejandro Graziano, Alejandro G Graziano et al.•The Economic Journal•2020

Citations per year0.5
Citation span2024 - 2024 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae