Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Biases in patent examination and firms’ responses

Evidence from the pharmaceutical industry

Bibliographic Data

ID12918050
AuthorsFei Yu (0000-0002-2824-9866, Tsinghua University), Yanrui Wu (0000-0002-8966-1459, The University of Western Australia, corresponding author), J Chen (0000-0002-0156-9237, Tsinghua University)
Year2016
Volume9
Issue2
Pages101-115
Publication date2016-03-29
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueChina Economic Journal (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1753-8963 • E-ISSN: 1753-8971
PublisherRoutledge (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/17538963.2016.1160535
OpenAlexW2320450423
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited27

Empirical analysis of matched patent application data in the world’s major patent offices has shown considerable variation in patent granting probability and examination duration across different countries. This phenomenon is attributed to institutional misclassifications or patent examiners’ mistakes by some authors. Others argued that cross-country heterogeneity could also be caused by deliberate manipulation of patent examination procedures with the goal to foster native inventors through suppressing foreign patent applicants. To explore whether manipulation exists, this study presents a case study of pharmaceutical patents granted by the US patent office and approved by the US FDA. Especially it focuses on the filing behavior of pharmaceutical companies in Korea, Japan and China. The regression results show that the granting ratio of the previous applications of a foreign company is correlated with the company’s probability of lodging a new patent application, which provides a supplementary evidence of the existence of the manipulated patent examination procedures

Actuarial science · Business · China · Empirical examination · Industrial organization · Patent application · Patent office · Pharmaceutical industry · Phenomenon · Political science · Innovation Policy and RD · Intellectual Property and Patents · Law · Medicine · Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy · Marketing

  • Technological leapfrogging and country strategic patent policy

    Open Access•Fei Yu, Yanrui Wu et al.•Journal of International Business…•2023

  • Fitting Heterogeneous Choice Models with Oglm

    Open Access•Richard Williams•The Stata Journal: Promoting…•2010

  • Language and foreign trade

    Open Access•Jacques Melitz•European Economic Review•2008

  • Market Size in Innovation

    Daron Acemoglu, Joshua Linn•The Quarterly Journal of Economics•2004

  • Generalized Ordered Logit/Partial Proportional Odds Models for Ordinal Dependent Variables

    Open Access•Richard Williams•The Stata Journal: Promoting…•2006

  • Pharmaceutical Price Controls and Entry Strategies

    Margaret K Kyle, Margaret Kyle•The Review of Economics and…•2007

  • Misclassification between Patent Offices

    Alfons Palangkaraya, Elizabeth Webster et al.•The Review of Economics and…•2011

  • Examiner Characteristics and Patent Office Outcomes

    Mark A Lemley, Bhaven Sampat•The Review of Economics and…•2012

  • Do National Patent Laws Stimulate Domestic Innovation in a Global Patenting Environment? A Cross-Country Analysis of Pharmaceutical Patent Protection, 1978–2002

    Yi Qian•The Review of Economics and…•2007

  • The patterns of patents in China

    Zhuan Xie, Xiaobo Zhang•China Economic Journal•2015

Unique citing works1
Citations per year0,33
Citation span2023 - 2023 (1)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae