Grounded under a Blue Sky
Tools for disrupting the peer review process as we know it
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12918469 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Meredith D Clark (0000-0003-2181-150X, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 18 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 290-291 |
| Publication date | 2025-11-18 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Communication Culture and Critique (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1753-9137 • E-ISSN: 1753-9129 |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1093/ccc/tcaf051 |
| OpenAlex | W7117361414 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 2 |
This article provides an introduction to a scholarly forum on intersectional approaches to challenging the peer-review process. Developed out of a Blue Sky session at the International Communication Association’s annual conference in 2025, the article and the forum discuss ways to build out of the strength of differences with practical insights that can be adopted throughout the publication process to advance critical scholarship
Peer review · Process (computing · Reflexivity · Session (web analytics · Academic Publishing and Open Access · Discourse Analysis in Language Studies · Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies
| Highly cited | No |
|---|