Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

US drone strikes, securitization processes and practices

A case study of Pakistan

Bibliographic Data

ID12918615
AuthorsAlamgir Khan (0000-0002-2320-5872, University of Swabi), Christian Kaunert (0000-0002-4493-2235, University of South Wales, corresponding author)
Year2023
Volume16
Issue2
Pages287-304
Publication date2023-03-02
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueCritical Studies on Terrorism (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1753-9161 • E-ISSN: 1753-9153
PublisherTaylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/17539153.2023.2179571
OpenAlexW4322767497
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited29

This article explores the importance of inter-related securitisation processes on each other, most notably the impact of securitisation practices in one country on the securitisation processes in another. It analyses the impact of US drone strikes on the securitisation processes related to the militancy conducted by successive Pakistani governments in the aftermath of 9/11. The successful securitisation of the war on terror by the US allowed the latter to take extraordinary measures to eliminate terrorism, most notably through the use of drone strikes. However, these securitisation practices inhibited the securitisation of militancy inside Pakistan. While we understand successful securitisation processes, we understand much less about unsuccessful securitisation cases. This article analyses the use of drone strikes as securitisation practices by the US and their impact on the unsuccessful securitisation process of militancy in Pakistan after 9/11. The empirical contribution of this article is its focus on the case of Pakistan where more than 400 drone strikes took place, reportedly killing approximately 7000 people. The article demonstrates how the drone strikes in Pakistan turned the war on terror into an American war and made it difficult for the domestic audience in Pakistan to accept the securitisation moves of the security actors

Business · Drone · Political economy · Political science · Securitization · Sociology · Terrorism · Global Security and Public Health · Law · Peacebuilding and International Security · South Asian Studies and Conflicts

  • China’s Stance in United Nations General Assembly Special Emergency Sessions on Ukraine

    Open Access•Aktoty Aitzhanova, Steffi Weil et al.•Journal of Asian Security and…•2026

  • Competitive Authoritarian Regimes, Securitisation Techniques and the Role of Audiences

    Open Access•Alamgir Khan, Christian Kaunert•Journal of Asian and African…•2024

  • Refugees, Security and the European Union

    Sarah Léonard, Christian Kaunert•Refugees, Security and the…•2019

  • Security

    Barry Buzan, Ole Waever et al.•Security•1997

  • A critical evaluation of American drone strikes in Pakistan

    Wali Aslam•Critical Studies on Terrorism•2011

  • A Pragmatic Guide to Qualitative Historical Analysis in the Study of International Relations

    Cameron G Thies•International Studies Perspectives•2002

  • Drones over Pakistan

    Christian Enemark•Asian Security•2011

  • A Foucaultian view on spill-over

    Open Access•J Huysmans•Journal of International…•2004

  • Drone Warfare

    Open Access•Leila Hudson, Colin S Owens et al.•Middle East Policy•2011

  • The CIA's Covert Predator Drone War in Pakistan, 2004–2010

    Brian Glyn Williams•Studies in Conflict and Terrorism•2010

  • The Copenhagen School on Tour in Kyrgyzstan

    Open Access•Claire Wilkinson•Security Dialogue•2007

  • Securitization and counter-securitization in Afghanistan

    Open Access•Holger Stritzel, Sean C Chang•Security Dialogue•2015

  • Extraordinary or ordinary emergency measures

    Rita Floyd•Cambridge Review of International…•2015

  • Framing’ the Copenhagen School

    Open Access•Scott D Watson•Millennium Journal of International…•2011

  • Do U.S. Drone Strikes Cause Blowback? Evidence from Pakistan and Beyond

    Aqil Shah•International Security•2018

  • Pakistani Political Communication and Public Opinion on US Drone Attacks

    Carol Christine Fair, Karl Kaltenthaler et al.•Journal of Strategic Studies•2015

  • Countering global insurgency

    David Kilcullen, David J Kilcullen•Journal of Strategic Studies•2005

  • Failed Securitisation Moves during the 2015 ‘Migration Crisis’

    Open Access•Helen Hintjens•International Migration•2019

  • Failed Securitization

    Jan Ruzicka•Polity•2019

  • The Psychosocial Effects of Drone Violence

    Open Access•Alex Edney‐browne•Political Psychology•2019

  • The Policy Tools of Securitization

    Open Access•Thierry Balzacq•JCMS Journal of Common Market…•2008

  • Sécurité et immigration

    Open Access•D Bigo•Cultures & conflits/Cultures et…•1998

  • Security and Immigration

    Open Access•D Bigo•Alternatives Global Local Political•2002

  • Drones, spies, terrorists, and second-class citizenship in Pakistan

    Carol Christine Fair•Small Wars and Insurgencies•2014

  • The costs and consequences of drone warfare

    Open Access•Michael J Boyle•International Affairs•2013

Unique citing works2
Citations per year1
Citation span2024 - 2026 (3)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 2

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae