Integration after totalitarianism

Arendt and Habermas on the postwar imperatives of memory

Bibliographic Data

ID12923239
AuthorsPeter J Verovšek (0000-0001-8946-2014, University of Sheffield, corresponding author)
Year2018
Volume16
Issue1
Pages2-24
Publication date2018-09-03
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of International Political Theory (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1755-0882 • E-ISSN: 1755-1722
PublisherSAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/1755088218796535
OpenAlexW2891538750
LanguageEN
Citations received8
References cited55

Collective memories of totalitarianism and the industrialized slaughter of the Holocaust have exerted a profound influence on postwar European politics and philosophy. Two of the most prominent political theorists and public intellectuals to take up the legacy of total war are Hannah Arendt and Jürgen Habermas. However, their prescriptions seem to pull in opposite directions. While Arendt draws on remembrance to recover politics on a smaller scale by advocating for the empowerment of local councils, Habermas draws on the past to justify his search for postnational forms of political community that can overcome the bloody legacy of nationalism. My argument brings these two perspectives together by examining their mutual support for European integration as a way of preserving the lessons of totalitarianism. I argue that both Arendt and Habermas reject the technocratic tendencies of the European Union while maintaining hope that it can develop a truly postnational form of politics

Argument (complex analysis · Democracy · Epistemology · European union · Nationalism · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Social science · Sociology · Technocracy · Eastern European Communism and Reforms · Hannah Arendt's Political Philosophy · Law · Philosophy · Political Theology and Sovereignty