Global justice, sovereignty, and the problem of perspective
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12923359 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Jennifer Szende (0000-0001-8778-6082, McMaster University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2019 |
| Volume | 17 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 99-116 |
| Publication date | 2019-06-13 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of International Political Theory (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1755-0882 • E-ISSN: 1755-1722 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/1755088219852646 |
| OpenAlex | W2951762308 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 35 |
This article argues that a state-centered theory of global justice exhibits an epistemic problem of perspective, and that this worry exhibits a gendered character. Within a liberal domestic theory of justice, the public/private distinction has been repeatedly shown to be bad for women because it creates a domain for injustice that becomes invisible to public policy and the law. This article argues that state-centered theories of global justice create an analogous space that is cut off from questions of global justice. The article therefore suggests that this way of framing questions of global justice is problematic, and is problematic for women in particular. Just as the public/private distinction in liberal domestic justice leaves cases of injustice outside the vision of the law, the hard distinction between the domestic (state) sphere and the international realm of justice leaves cases of injustice invisible to international law. For the question of global justice, the privileging of sovereignty and non-intervention compromises the ability of the theory to achieve its purported goal of universal justice
Economic Justice · Framing (construction · Global justice · Injustice · International law · Law and economics · Political science · Politics · Public international law · Public sphere · Realm · Sociology · Sovereignty · Theory of criminal justice · Hannah Arendt's Political Philosophy · Law · Political Philosophy and Ethics · Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought
Decolonizing Universalism
The Heart of Human Rights
Atomism
Knowledge, Human Interests, and Objectivity in Feminist Epistemology
National Responsibility and Global Justice
The Feminist Critique of Liberalism
On Global Justice
Rawls's Law of Peoples
Responsibility and Global Justice
Justice and the Politics of Difference
Cosmopolitanism and Sovereignty
The Problem of Global Justice
Cosmopolitan Justice and Institutional Design
World Poverty and Human Rights
Justice without Borders
Feminism and Multiculturalism
Adaptive Preferences and Women's Empowerment
Multicultural Citizenship
Questioning universalism, devising an ethics without foundations
After Liberalism in World Politics? Towards an International Political Theory of Care
Selective humanitarian intervention
Care, gender and global social justice
Justice and the Priority of Politics to Morality
Liberal Neutrality
International Toleration
A Philosophy of International Law
Forty acres and a mule’ for women
Distributive Justice, State Coercion, and Autonomy
It's All In the Family
Families, Labour and Love
Feminist Politics and Human Nature
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |