The Habermas-Rawls Dispute Redivivus
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12923458 |
|---|---|
| Authors | J G Finlayson (0000-0003-0570-6048, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2007 |
| Volume | 3 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 144-162 |
| Publication date | 2007-04-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of International Political Theory (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1755-0882 • E-ISSN: 1755-1722 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/1743453x0700300111 |
| OpenAlex | W4206214959 |
| Language | EN |
This article outlines a critique of the currently widespread assessment that the there is nothing at issue in Habermas Rawls debate. It shows what is wrong with this assessment and explains how it arose. Finally it attempts to outline what is really at issue in the Habermas Rawls debate, and se tthe debate in the wider framework of Kantian justifications of political norms
Economic Justice · Epistemology · Law and economics · Legitimacy · Original position · Political philosophy · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Critical Theory and Philosophy · Law · Philosophy
| Highly cited | No |
|---|