How Should We Respond to ‘Delinquent’ Institutions

Bibliographic Data

ID12923547
AuthorsToni Erskine (0000-0002-5352-6319, corresponding author)
Year2008
Volume4
Issue1
Pages1-8
Publication date2008-04-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of International Political Theory (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1755-0882 • E-ISSN: 1755-1722
PublisherSAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.3366/e1755088208000050
OpenAlexW2055134055
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited13

In international politics, institutions – in the sense of formal organisations – are frequently portrayed as important bearers of duties and appropriate objects of blame. This makes eminent sense. Many states, multinational corporations, and intergovernmental organisations, to name a few types of institutional actor, have considerable capacities to respond to crises, address injustices – and, indeed, cause harm on a grand scale. When the United States (US), for example, is widely charged with a moral obligation to combat climate change, and held to account for failing to take this responsibility seriously enough, such talk of duty and blame at the corporate level of the state is intuitively compelling. Simply put, individual human actors on their own lack the power, coordination and resources to achieve the outcomes (be they remedial or noxious) open to many institutions. The US, in contrast (and relative to many other states), has a significant capacity to redress large-scale environmental problems and h

Criminology · Political economy · Political science · Sociology · International Relations and Foreign Policy · Middle East and Rwanda Conflicts · Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub