Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Is the Burgess concentric zonal theory of spatial differentiation still applicable to urban Canada

Bibliographic Data

ID12924936
AuthorsT R Balakrishnan (0000-0002-2319-8692, Western University, corresponding author), George K Jarvis (University of Alberta)
Year1991
Volume28
Issue4
Pages526-539
Publication date1991-11-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueCanadian Review of Sociology/Revue canadienne de sociologie (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1755-6171 • E-ISSN: 1755-618X
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/j.1755-618x.1991.tb00168.x
OpenAlexW2029314786
LanguageEN
Citations received4
References cited13

L'auteur examine les données par centre de recensement provenant des recensements de 1961,1971 et 1981 dans le but d'étudier, dans les quatorze agglomérations les plus importantes au Canada, la persistance de la répartition de la population en zones concentriques selon la situation socio‐économique et la taille de la famille prédite par la théorie de Burgess. II conclut que même si le caractère des zones n'est plus tout à fait le même que dans le Canada d'antan, le phénomène de la stratification progressive a non seulement persisté, mais s'est peut‐être même accentué en ce qui a trait à la situation socio‐économique et à la taille des families. Cette persistance s'explique, d'une part, par les valeurs sociales, qui continuent à attacher beaucoup d'importance à la possession d'une maison unifamiliale et, d'autre part, par l'aménagement et le maintien d'un réseau routier qui permet aux gens de travailler dans les grandes villes canadiennes tout en vivant en banlieue ou à la campagne. Using census tract data from the censuses of 1961,1971 and 1981, this paper examines the durability of concentric zonal patterns in socio‐economic status and family size predicted by Burgess' theory in the 14 largest metropolitan areas of Canada. Although the character of the zones may have changed over time in modern day Canada, it was found that the gradient pattern itself not only persists but may have intensified as far as socio‐economic status and family size are concerned. This persistence is attributed to the strong societal norm of owning a single family detached dwelling and the development and maintenance of roadways which still make it worthwhile to commute to work in Canadian cities

Archaeology · Art · Cartography · Geography · Humanities · Metropolitan area · Political science · Sociology · Demography · Regional Economics and Spatial Analysis · Rural development and sustainability · Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies

  • A Comprehensive Review on the Development and Evolution of Urban Growth Models and Current Challenges

    Open Access•Manish Ratna Bhusal, Muhammad Atiq Ur Rehman Tariq et al.•Current Urban Studies•2024

  • Prevalent Low Income Status in Canadian and United States Metropolitan Areas, 1980 and 1990

    Kevin M Gorey•International Journal of…•1998

  • Changing Boundaries

    Open Access•Leo Driedger•Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue…•2003

  • The spatial separation of the poor in Canadian cities

    Open Access•Eric Fong, Kumiko Shibuya•Demography•2000

  • The Evolution of City-Suburban Types in the Course of a Decade

    Open Access•Leo F Schnore, Joy K O Jones•Urban Affairs Quarterly•1969

  • Measuring City-Suburban Status Differences

    Open Access•Leo F Schnore•Urban Affairs Quarterly•1967

  • The Disappearance of Skid Row

    Open Access•Barrett A Lee•Urban Affairs Quarterly•1980

  • The Determinants of Gentrification in the United States

    Open Access•Bruce London, Barrett A Lee et al.•Urban Affairs Quarterly•1986

  • Socioeconomic differentiation in Urbdn Canada

    Open Access•T R Balakrishnan, George K Jarvis•Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue…•1976

  • Socioeconomic status and the concentric zonal structure of Canadian cities

    Open Access•Peter C Pineo•Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue…•1988

  • Changing Patterns of Spatial Differentiation in Urban Canada, 1961–1971

    Open Access•T R Balakrishnan, George K Jarvis•Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue…•1979

  • Urban structure and suburban selectivity

    Open Access•Leo F Schnore•Demography•1964

  • The applicability of the burgess zonal hypothesis to urban Canada

    Open Access•Avery M Guest•Demography•1969

  • Another Look at the Burgess Hypothesis

    Lee J Haggerty•American Journal of Sociology•1971

  • Spatial Aspects of Social Area Analysis

    Theodore R Anderson, Janice A Egeland•American Sociological Review•1961

  • Keeping up the Neighborhood

    Anne B Shlay, Peter H Rossi•American Sociological Review•1981

  • Status Shifts Within the City

    Harvey M Choldin, Claudine Hanson•American Sociological Review•1982

Unique citing works4
Citations per year0,14
Citation span1998 - 2024 (27)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 4

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae