Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The leader succession‐performance relationship in a non‐profit organization

Bibliographic Data

ID12926404
AuthorsMarc S Mentzer (0000-0002-9863-6183, University of Saskatchewan, corresponding author)
Year1993
Volume30
Issue2
Pages191-204
Publication date1993-05-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueCanadian Review of Sociology/Revue canadienne de sociologie (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1755-6171 • E-ISSN: 1755-618X
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/j.1755-618x.1993.tb00172.x
OpenAlexW2154061072
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited23

Au fils des ans, l'impact de la succession à la direction d'une organisation sur l'efficacité de celle‐ci a fait l'objet de diverses théories contradictoires et de maintes études aux conclusions non moins différentes. L'étude résumée dans cette communication examine l'impact de la succession et des capacités du dirigeant sur l'«efficacité» de 150 églises affiliées à l'Église unie du Canada. Les données recueillies semblent indiquer que la succession à la direction influe positivement sur la fréquentation mais non sur les revenus, tandis que les capacités du dirigeant n'ont aucun impact linéaire. Cependant, l'auteur relève une relation curviligne entre le nombre d'années d'expérience du pasteur et l'augmentation de l'assistance. Ces résultats imprévus illustrent bien le fait que la relation succession‐efficacité dépend dans une large mesure des caractéristiques des organisations étudiées. The impact of leader succession on organizational performance has yielded a history of inconsistent findings and conflicting theories. This study examines the impact of leader succession and leader ability on the performance of 150 church pastorates in the United Church of Canada. These results suggest that leader succession has a positive effect on attendance but not revenue, while leader ability has no linear impact. However, there is a curvilinear relationship between years of pastoral experience and growth in attendance. These unexpected results illustrate that the succession‐performance relationship is highly dependent on the characteristics of the organizations under study

Biology · Business · Ecological succession · Industrial organization · Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering · Religion, Society, and Development · Ecology

  • Reflexivity in practical theology

    Peter Bunton•Practical Theology•2019

  • Does Leadership Make a Difference to Organizational Performance

    Alan Berkeley Thomas, Alan Thomas•Administrative Science Quarterly•1988

  • Administrative Succession in Formal Organizations

    Oscar Grusky•Social Forces•1960

  • Canada's Lower Middle Class

    Open Access•Edward G Grabb•The Canadian Journal of Sociology•1975

  • Leadership and Organizational Performance

    Stanley Lieberson, James F O''Connor et al.•American Sociological Review•1972

  • The Validity of Denominational Membership Data in Canada

    Marc S Mentzer•Sociological Analysis•1991

  • Scapegoating in Baseball

    William A Gamson, Norman A Scotch•American Journal of Sociology•1964

  • Managerial Succession and Organizational Effectiveness

    Oscar Grusky•American Journal of Sociology•1963

  • Managerial Succession in Complex Organizations

    Robert H Guest•American Journal of Sociology•1962

Citations per year0.14
Citation span2019 - 2019 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae