Resiliences to radicalization
Four key perspectives
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12926883 |
|---|---|
| Authors | William Stephens (0000-0001-9593-0101, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, corresponding author), Stijn Sieckelinck (0000-0002-6938-6752, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam) |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 66 |
| Pages | 100486-100486 |
| Publication date | 2021-06-10 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International journal of law, crime and justice (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1756-0616 • E-ISSN: 1876-763X |
| Publisher | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.ijlcj.2021.100486 |
| OpenAlex | W3172542843 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
| References cited | 31 |
Building resilience to radicalization has become a key pillar of many policies for preventing violent extremism. However, sustained debates over the precise nature of the terms radicalisation and resilience impact the ability to implement these policies. A growing body of literature argues that the way in which key ideas are understood matters to what happens in practice. Additionally, the cross-sector collaboration called for in PVE policy can be made more challenging through divergences in understanding of central concepts. As such, the way in which resilience to radicalization is being understood by frontline workers matters. In light of this, a q-methodology study was conducted, which identified four perspectives on resilience to radicalization amongst policy-makers and practitioners in Belgium, the Netherlands, and the UK. These perspectives are examined in light of the broader debates around both resilience and radicalization, and the extent to which the divergences matter for collaboration is considered
Computer security · Criminology · Key (lock · Political science · Psychological resilience · Public relations · Radicalization · Resilience (materials science · Sociology · Terrorism · Violent extremism · Computer Science · Disaster Management and Resilience · Law · Psychology · Resilience and Mental Health · Social Psychology · Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
Doing Q Methodological Research
The Social Ecology of Resilience
Policy Implementation, Street-level Bureaucracy, and the Importance of Discretion
Dangerously exposed
'Boosting resilience' and 'safeguarding youngsters at risk'
Understanding Terror Networks
Preventing Violent Extremism
Decentring counter-terrorism
Discipline, morality and the façade of localism in action
The enactment of the counter-terrorism “Prevent duty” in British schools and colleges
Is resilience a favourable concept in terrorism research? The multifaceted discourses of resilience in the academic literature
Being resilient to radicalisation in PVE policy
Decentring security governance
Community Resilience to Militant Islamism
What is Local Resilience Against Radicalization and How can it be Promoted? A Multidisciplinary Literature Review
The ABC Model
The social ecology of resilience
Understanding political radicalization
Building community resilience to violent extremism through genuine partnerships
Securitisation, Counterterrorism and the Silencing of Dissent
The Psychology of Radicalization and Deradicalization
State Agent or Citizen Agent
Interrogating resilience
The Attitudes-Behaviors Corrective (ABC) Model of Violent Extremism
Youth Resilience to Violent Extremism
The trouble with radicalization
Crafting the 'Well-Rounded Citizen
| Citations per year | 1.5 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2024 - 2026 (3) |
| Highly cited | No |