Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Clustering of UK universities based on the research productivity of psychology departments

Bibliographic Data

ID12928849
AuthorsGaurav Saxena (0000-0002-9526-2550, corresponding author), Katerina Anne Lai (0000-0002-2700-5958), Peter Allen (0000-0001-8329-0426)
Year2022
Volume15
Issue3
Pages385-393
Publication date2022-10-26
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePower and Education (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1757-7438 • E-ISSN: 1757-7438
PublisherSAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/17577438221130983
OpenAlexW4307560931
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited17

Higher education institutions in the UK have organised into mission groups for the advocacy of shared interests and ideologies. Although research productivity is claimed as a key point of difference between these groups, this claim has received relatively little empirical scrutiny. The current study examined the clustering of UK universities based on the research productivity of academic psychologists. It found evidence for the Russell Group’s (RG’s) claim that it represents leading, research-intensive universities, at least with respects to the discipline of psychology. Productivity metrics of a representative sample of 1339 academic psychologists were extracted from Scopus and Scimago database and were averaged to derive department level productivity indicators. Results from cluster analysis provided evidence in favour of RG’s research superiority claim. Cluster level averages of the cluster comprising RG universities were approximately 50–300% higher than those of the cluster comprising non-RG universities. As anticipated, the universities of Oxford and Cambridge surpassed all others to form separate clusters representing an ‘elite’ within the RG

Cluster (spacecraft · Cluster analysis · Cluster grouping · Economic growth · Economics · Elite · Higher education · Mathematics education · Political science · Politics · Productivity · Public relations · Scopus · Scrutiny · Social science · Sociology · Doctoral Education Challenges and Solutions · Evaluation of Teaching Practices · Law · Psychology · scientometrics and bibliometrics research

  • Examining the Research Performance of Universities with Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods

    Open Access•Muammer Maral•SAGE Open•2024

  • Research performance of higher education in OECD countries

    Open Access•Muammer Maral•SAGE Open•2024

  • Hierarchical Cluster Analysis

    Open Access•Odilia Yim, Kylee T Ramdeen•The Quantitative Methods for…•2015

  • Building an innovation hub

    Open Access•Jan Youtie, Philip Shapira•Research Policy•2008

  • Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar

    Open Access•Matthew E Falagas, Eleni I Pitsouni et al.•The FASEB Journal•2008

  • Are there distinctive clusters of higher and lower status universities in the UK?

    Vikki Boliver•Oxford Review of Education•2015

  • Research performance of academic psychologists in the United Kingdom

    Open Access•Katerina Anne Lai, Gaurav Saxena et al.•Scientometrics•2022

  • Comparing Research Productivity Across Disciplines and Career Stages

    Meghna Sabharwal•Journal of Comparative Policy…•2013

  • Measuring research 'impact' for academic promotion

    Kylie Smith, Kylie M Smith et al.•Journal of Higher Education…•2013

  • Entry to Elite Positions and the Stratification of Higher Education in Britain

    Open Access•Paul Wakeling, M Savage•The Sociological Review•2015

Unique citing works2
Citations per year1
Citation span2024 - 2024 (1)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 2

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae