Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Nimbyism revisited

Public acceptance of wind energy in the United States

Bibliographic Data

ID12929022
AuthorsMaria A Petrova (0000-0002-0127-9272, Tufts University, corresponding author)
Year2013
Volume4
Issue6
Pages575-601
Publication date2013-10-03
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueWiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Climate Change (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1757-7780 • E-ISSN: 1757-7799
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1002/wcc.250
OpenAlexW2121037271
LanguageEN
Citations received57
References cited133

The acronym NIMBY , known to stand for ‘Not‐In‐My‐Back‐Yard’, generally describes resistance to siting specific projects close to one's area of residence while exhibiting acceptance of similar projects elsewhere. As wind energy continues to be recognized as a successful technology for meeting renewable energy targets and decreasing carbon dioxide emissions, the siting of wind turbines is a growing challenge that policy makers, facility planners, and wind developers face. The most often cited motivations for public support and opposition are reviewed here with a focus on wind energy developments in the United States. The purpose is to present the existing state of research on community responses to wind energy and to answer the following questions: What motivates support and opposition to facility siting, and in particular to wind energy facilities? Does the literature provide substantial evidence that NIMBYism is the determining motivation for opposition in the United States and, by extension, does the term's widespread use help to explain opposition? What mechanisms have been proposed for ‘overcoming’ NIMBYism , if it is present? This paper, following the recommendations of other social scientists, provides a collective call for a significant course shift: rather than proposing strategies to ‘overcome’ opposition, research should focus on proposing how to make siting successful. Drawing on a review of the relevant literature, the ‘ ENUF ’ framework—which stands for ‘Engage, Never use NIMBY , Understand, and Facilitate’—is introduced as a step in that direction. WIREs Clim Change 2013, 4:575–601. doi: 10.1002/wcc.250 This article is categorized under: Perceptions, Behavior, and Communication of Climate Change > Behavior Change and Responses The Carbon Economy and Climate Mitigation > Policies, Instruments, Lifestyles, Behavior

Business · Civil engineering · Environmental planning · NIMBY · Opposition (politics · Political science · Politics · Public relations · Renewable energy · Residence · Sociology · Wind power · Engineering · Environmental Science · Law · Risk Perception and Management · Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy · Sustainability and Climate Change Governance

  • A defasagem de conhecimento na prática na Avaliação de Impacto Ambiental em projetos de energia eólica

    Open Access•Izabella De Camargo Aversa, Marcelo Montaño•Desenvolvimento e Meio Ambiente•2019

  • Understanding the Amenity Impacts of Wind Development on an International Border

    Open Access•Martin D Heintzelman, Richard J Vyn et al.•Ecological Economics•2017

  • Old petrol in new bottles? The geopolitical implications of the energy transition in the Middle East and North Africa

    Open Access•Emre Hatipoglu, Muhammad Mohsin Hussain•Energy Research & Social Science•2026

  • The Ethical Wrongdoing of Morally Objectionable Nimbys

    Open Access•Hugh Breakey, Larelle Bossi et al.•Ethics, Policy & Environment•2026

  • Visualizing Hope

    Open Access•Andrea Mah, Carolina Aragon et al.•Weather, Climate, and Society•2024

  • Recreational boaters’ preferences for boating trips associated with offshore wind farms in US waters

    Open Access•Tracey Dalton, Michael Weir et al.•Marine Policy•2020

  • Landscape Visual Impact Evaluation for Onshore Wind Farm

    Open Access•Jinjin Guan•ISPRS International Journal of…•2022

  • Assessing the social acceptance of key technologies for the German energy transition

    Open Access•Dorothee Baur, Philip Emmerich et al.•Energy Sustainability and Society•2022

  • Supply, demand and polarization challenges facing US climate policies

    Open Access•Matthew G Burge, Leaf Van Boven et al.•Nature Climate Change•2024

  • Perceived risks, benefits, and support for siting energy infrastructure

    Open Access•Sara Ostad Rahimi, Amanda L Molder et al.•Journal of Risk Research•2026

  • Public perception of offshore wind farms in Ireland

    Open Access•Yvonne Cronin, Valerie Cummins et al.•Marine Policy•2021

  • From Green to Red

    Open Access•Anne Spencer Jamison, Barbara Ganson et al.•Journal of Business Ethics•2026

  • Prairie Wind

    Andrea Olive•The American Review of Canadian…•2021

  • Do the ends justify the means? Problematizing social acceptance and instrumentally-driven community engagement in proposed energy projects

    Open Access•Stacia S Ryder, Chad Walker et al.•Socio-Ecological Practice Research•2023

  • Legacies Matter

    Shardul Tiwari, Chelsea Schelly et al.•Case Studies in the Environment•2023

  • Operators’ good community engagement practices in energy projects

    Open Access•Stacia S Ryder, Stacia Ryder et al.•Energy Sustainability and Society•2026

  • The power of place

    Open Access•Eliza Batchelder, Loren Mcclenachan et al.•Marine Policy•2025

  • Farmers’ attitude towards green ammonia produced by upcycling waste nitrogen

    Open Access•Yu Wang, Wenzhen Li et al.•Sustainable Futures•2025

  • Are all renewable energy sources the same? A comparative analysis of public perceptions and preferences for renewable energy types in Southeast Asian cities

    Open Access•Daniel Del Barrio Alvarez, Nan Wang et al.•Sustainability Science•2024

  • The connections—and misconnections—between the public and politicians over climate policy

    Open Access•David K Sherman, Leaf Van Boven•Social Issues and Policy Review•2023

  • Environmental effects of urban wind energy harvesting

    Open Access•Ioannis Tsionas, Maider Llaguno-Munitxa et al.•Buildings and Cities•2025

  • Beyond the public in controversies

    Open Access•Elisabeth van de Grift, Eefje Cuppen•Energy Research & Social Science•2022

  • Climate mitigation policies and the potential pathways to conflict

    Open Access•E A Gilmore, Halvard Buhaug•Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews…•2021

  • Public engagement with offshore renewable energy

    Open Access•Bouke Wiersma, Patrick Devine‐wright•Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews…•2014

  • Comparative Energy Transition Policy

    Open Access•Lena Maria Schaffer, Zsuzsanna Magyar•Journal of Comparative Policy…•2024

  • The Impact of Auditory and Visual Experience with Wind Turbines on Support for Wind Production and Proximity-Based Opposition

    Rachel M Krause, John C Pierce et al.•Society & Natural Resources•2016

  • See me, Feel me, Touch me, Heal me

    Open Access•Jeremy Firestone, Alison Bates et al.•Land Use Policy•2015

  • Dynamic land use implications of rapidly expanding and evolving wind power deployment

    Open Access•Dylan Harrison‐Atlas, Anthony Lopez et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2022

  • Coastal residents’ attitudes toward offshore oil and gas drilling in China

    Open Access•Mo Chen, Pim Martens•The Extractive Industries and…•2021

  • All's fair in love and WAR

    Open Access•Douglas L Bessette, Jessica Crawford•Energy Research & Social Science•2022

  • Backyard voices

    Open Access•Parrish Bergquist, Stephen Ansolabehere et al.•Energy Research & Social Science•2019

  • Conceptualizing a social sustainability framework for energy infrastructure decisions

    Open Access•John Whitton, Ioan Charnley-Parry et al.•Energy Research & Social Science•2015

  • Proposing a value-sharing mechanism for wind power

    Open Access•Kyungmin Lee, Sun-Jin Yun et al.•Energy Research & Social Science•2026

  • Will it float? Exploring the social feasibility of floating solar energy infrastructure in the Netherlands

    Open Access•Vincent Bax, Wietse I van de Lageweg et al.•Energy Research & Social Science•2022

  • Community benefits, framing and the social acceptance of offshore wind farms

    Open Access•Benjamin J A Walker, Bouke Wiersma et al.•Energy Research & Social Science•2014

  • Burdened by renewable energy? A multi-scalar analysis of distributional justice and wind energy in the United States

    Open Access•J Tom Mueller, Matthew M Brooks•Energy Research & Social Science•2019

  • Community acceptance of large-scale solar energy installations in developing countries

    Open Access•Susanne Hanger-Kopp, Nadejda Komendantova et al.•Energy Research & Social Science•2016

  • Beyond yes and no

    Open Access•Greg Stelmach, Hilary Boudet et al.•Energy Research & Social Science•2026

  • Renewable energy for whom? A global systematic review of the environmental justice implications of renewable energy technologies

    Open Access•Anthony M Levenda, Ingrid Behrsin et al.•Energy Research & Social Science•2020

  • Sustainable energy transformations in an age of populism, post-truth politics, and local resistance

    Open Access•Cornelia Fraune, Michèle Knodt•Energy Research & Social Science•2018

  • Impacts, procedural processes, and local context

    Open Access•Cornelis Willem Klok, Arjan F Kirkels et al.•Energy Research & Social Science•2023

  • Symbolic meanings, landowner support, and dedicated bioenergy crops in the rural northeastern United States

    Open Access•Weston M Eaton, Morey Burnham et al.•Energy Research & Social Science•2019

  • Transactional or transformative? Offshore wind developer perspectives on community benefit mechanisms in the United States

    Open Access•Lorren Ruscetta, Emma Korein et al.•Energy Research & Social Science•2026

  • Beyond dark money

    Open Access•Isaac Slevin, William Kattrup et al.•Energy Research & Social Science•2024

  • Is it really all about the return on investment? Exploring private wind energy investors' preferences

    Open Access•Johannes Gamel, Klaus Menrad et al.•Energy Research & Social Science•2016

  • Carbon or cash

    Open Access•Drexel A Peterson, Kristy C Carter et al.•Energy Research & Social Science•2019

  • Rallying the anti-crowd

    Open Access•Jessica Crawford, Douglas L Bessette et al.•Energy Research & Social Science•2022

  • Thirty years of North American wind energy acceptance research

    Open Access•Joseph Rand, Ben Hoen•Energy Research & Social Science•2017

  • Neutralization strategies account for the concern-behavior gap in renewable energy usage – Evidence from panel data from Germany

    Open Access•Robert Neumann, Guido Mehlkop•Energy Research & Social Science•2023

  • Wind energy in the city

    Open Access•Iman Khorsand, Christine Kormos et al.•Energy Research & Social Science•2015

  • Predicting attitudes towards fusion energy in Europe

    Open Access•Christopher R Jones, Christian Oltra et al.•Energy Research & Social Science•2021

  • Beyond a checklist for acceptance

    Open Access•Nikki Kluskens, Floortje Alkemade et al.•Sustainability Science•2024

  • Public perceptions of hydraulic fracturing for shale gas and oil in the United States and Canada

    Open Access•Merryn Thomas, Nick Pidgeon et al.•Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews…•2017

  • Sustainable City’ requires ‘recognition’—The example of environmental education under pressure from the compact city

    Open Access•M Wolsink•Land Use Policy•2016

  • Is local opposition taking the wind out of the energy transition

    Open Access•Federica Daniele, Guido de Blasio et al.•European Journal of Political…•2026

  • Electoral Backlash or Positive Reinforcement? Wind Power and Congressional Elections in the United States

    Johannes Urpelainen, Alice Tianbo Zhang•The Journal of Politics•2022

  • Explaining turnout in local referenda in the Czech Republic

    Michal Nový•East European Politics•2016

  • Wind power and community benefits

    Open Access•Mhairi Aitken•Energy Policy•2010

  • Understanding ‘local’ opposition to wind development in the UK

    Open Access•Christopher R Jones, J Richard Eiser•Energy Policy•2010

  • Understanding public responses to offshore wind power

    Open Access•Claire Haggett•Energy Policy•2011

  • Understanding and Overcoming the Nimby Syndrome

    Michael Dear•Journal of the American Planning…•1992

  • Societal acceptance of wind farms

    N Hall, Peta Ashworth et al.•Energy Policy•2013

  • Using the Language of Nimby

    Kate Burningham•Local Environment•2000

  • Valuing the attributes of renewable energy investments

    Open Access•Ariel Bergmann, Nick Hanley et al.•Energy Policy•2006

  • The Offshore Wind Power Debate

    Willett Kempton, Jeremy Firestone et al.•Coastal Management•2005

  • Perception of climate change

    Open Access•Jeffrey E Hansen, James Hansen et al.•Proceedings of the National…•2012

  • The role of values in public beliefs and attitudes towards commercial wind energy

    David Bidwell•Energy Policy•2013

  • Good Neighbours, Public Relations and Bribes

    Noel Cass, Gordon Walker et al.•Journal of Environmental Policy &…•2010

  • Over the Sea and Far Away? A Consideration of the Planning, Politics and Public Perception of Offshore Wind Farms

    Claire Haggett•Journal of Environmental Policy &…•2008

  • Emotion and rationality

    Open Access•Noel Cass, Gordon Walker•Emotion, space and society•2009

  • Wind energy planning in England, Wales and Denmark

    Open Access•Joyce McLaren Loring•Energy Policy•2007

  • Imagined publics and engagement around renewable energy technologies in the UK

    Open Access•Julie Barnett, Kate Burningham et al.•Public Understanding of Science•2010

  • Public engagement with information on renewable energy developments

    Open Access•Judi McLean Parks, Kate Theobald et al.•Public Understanding of Science•2013

  • Acceptance, acceptability and environmental justice

    Richard Cowell, Gabriel Bristow et al.•Journal of Environmental Planning…•2011

  • What Do People Know About Global Climate Change? 1. Mental Models

    Open Access•Ann Bostrom, Michael G Morgan et al.•Risk Analysis•1994

  • Understanding the Nimby and Lulu Phenomena

    Open Access•Carissa Schively•Journal of Planning Literature•2007

  • Many ways to say ‘no’, different ways to say ‘yes’

    Geraint Ellis, John Barry et al.•Journal of Environmental Planning…•2007

  • Disruption to place attachment and the protection of restorative environments

    Open Access•Patrick Devine‐wright, Patrick Devine-Wright et al.•Journal of Environmental Psychology•2010

  • Place attachment and public acceptance of renewable energy

    Open Access•Patrick Devine‐wright, Patrick Devine-Wright•Journal of Environmental Psychology•2011

  • ‘Green On Green’

    Charles R Warren, C Eric Lumsden et al.•Journal of Environmental Planning…•2005

  • Consensus-building across Difficult Divisions

    Patsy Healey•Planning Practice and Research•1996

  • A Call for Clarity and a Review of the Empirical Evidence

    Claire Haggett•Ethics Place & Environment•2010

  • Public engagement with large‐scale renewable energy technologies

    Open Access•Patrick Devine‐wright•Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews…•2010

  • Public perceptions and governance of controversial technologies to tackle climate change

    Open Access•Marc Poumadère, Raquel Bertoldo et al.•Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews…•2011

  • Cool Rationalities and Hot Air

    John Barry, Geraint Ellis et al.•Global Environmental Politics•2008

  • Mind the Gap

    Anja Kollmuss, Julian Agyeman•Environmental Education Research•2002

  • Rethinking Nimbyism

    Open Access•Patrick Devine‐wright•Journal of Community & Applied…•2009

  • Public understanding of global warming

    Willett Kempton•Society & Natural Resources•1991

  • Wind Energy Landscapes

    Martin J Pasqualetti•Society & Natural Resources•2001

  • Public Deliberation in an Age of Direct Citizen Participation

    Open Access•Nancy Roberts•The American Review of Public…•2004

  • Does community ownership affect public attitudes to wind energy? A case study from south-west Scotland

    Open Access•Charles R Warren, Malcolm McFadyen•Land Use Policy•2010

  • Spatial analyses of emerging and fading wind energy landscapes in Denmark

    Open Access•Bernd Möller•Land Use Policy•2010

  • Exploring the landscape of wind farm developments; local area characteristics and planning process outcomes in rural England

    Open Access•Dan Van Der Horst, David Toke•Land Use Policy•2010

  • Wind power planning, landscapes and publics

    Open Access•Alain Nadaï, Dan Van Der Horst•Land Use Policy•2010

  • Near-shore wind power—Protected seascapes, environmentalists’ attitudes, and the technocratic planning perspective

    Open Access•M Wolsink•Land Use Policy•2010

  • Wind power and planning

    Open Access•Richard Coles, Richard W Coles et al.•Land Use Policy•1993

  • Renewable energy and the public

    Open Access•Gordon Walker•Land Use Policy•1995

  • Contested environmental policy infrastructure

    Open Access•M Wolsink•Environmental Impact Assessment…•2010

  • The European Landscape Convention, Wind Power, and the Limits of the Local

    Thomas Oles, Karin Hammarlund•Landscape Research•2011

  • Citizen Participation and the Nimby Syndrome

    Open Access•Michael E Kraft, Bruce B Clary•The Western Political Quarterly•1991

  • Entanglement of Interests and Motives

    Open Access•M Wolsink•Urban Studies•1994

  • Technologies in Place

    Open Access•Carly Mclachlan•The Sociological Review•2009

  • Nimbys and Lulus

    Open Access•William R Freudenburg, Susan K Pastor•Journal of Social Issues•1992

  • Biodiversity & Environmental Sustainability amid Human Domination of Global Ecosystems

    Open Access•D Tilman•Daedalus•2012

  • Invalid theory impedes our understanding

    Open Access•M Wolsink•Transactions of the Institute of…•2006

  • We Don’t Take the Pledge”

    Open Access•Wendy Jepson, Christian Brannstrom et al.•Geoforum•2012

  • Social Perspectives on Wind-Power Development in West Texas

    Christian Brannstrom, Wendy Jepson et al.•Annals of the Association of…•2011

  • Opposing Wind Energy Landscapes

    Martin J Pasqualetti•Annals of the Association of…•2011

  • The ‘Social Gap’ in Wind Farm Siting Decisions

    Derek Bell, Tim Gray et al.•Environmental Politics•2005

  • Renewable Energy and Sociotechnical Change

    Open Access•Gordon Walker, Noel Ca et al.•Environment and Planning A…•2010

  • Morality, Space, and the Power of Wind-Energy Landscapes

    Open Access•Martin J Pasqualetti•Geographical Review•2000

  • Putting Social Movements in their Place

    Open Access•Thomas D Beamish•Contemporary Sociology A Journal…•2014

  • Public Attitudes Toward Construction of New Power Plants

    Stephen Ansolabehere, Ansolabehere et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•2009

  • Steel forests or smoke stacks

    Open Access•Roopali Phadke•Environmental Politics•2010

  • Engaging the Public

    Open Access•Susan Owens•Environment and Planning A…•2000

Unique citing works57
Citations per year4,75
Citation span2014 - 2026 (13)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 55

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae