Focus groups and serious gaming in climate change communication research—A methodological review
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 12929134 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Wibeck (0000-0001-5652-3116, Linköping University, autor de correspondencia), Tina‐simone Neset (0000-0003-1151-9943, Linköping University) |
| Año | 2020 |
| Volumen | 11 |
| Número | 5 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2020-06-03 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Climate Change (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 1757-7780 • E-ISSN: 1757-7799 |
| Editorial | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1002/wcc.664 |
| OpenAlex | W3032911650 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 4 |
| Referencias citadas | 117 |
This article explores the methodological challenges and opportunities of climate change communication research in a digital landscape. It scrutinizes the potential and limitations of combining group‐based qualitative interview methods, such as focus groups, with new digital media tools such as serious games. The paper brings together three strands of research: Climate change communication studies, methods literature on focus groups, and literature on (digital) serious gaming. Our review demonstrates that studies that deliberately combine focus groups methods with serious gaming have hitherto been scarce. There is a proliferation of digital visualization tools in climate change communication. We therefore see the need to critically explore what and how the integration of digital tools into qualitative group‐based studies can contribute to enhancing research into climate change communication and knowledge development. To illuminate the opportunities and challenges for the integration of serious gaming in focus group studies in the area of climate change communication, we bring in a few illustrative examples from a research project that integrated focus group methodology with a serious game on climate adaptation in Nordic agriculture. Introducing digital serious games in focus group‐based climate change communication studies can benefit climate change communication research in at least three ways: (a) by spurring participants’ in‐depth discussions, facilitating analysis of how sense‐making occurs; (b) by providing opportunities to evaluate features of the game itself and to develop it for different target audiences; and (c) by forming part of participatory climate change communication activities, engaging lay people and/or experts in co‐creating knowledge. This article is categorized under: Perceptions, Behavior, and Communication of Climate Change > Perceptions of Climate Change
Adaptation (eye · Business · Citizen journalism · Climate change · Communication in small groups · Data science · Focus group · Knowledge management · World Wide Web · Climate Change Communication and Perception · Computer Science · Environmental Education and Sustainability · Psychology · Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy · Social Psychology · Ecology · Marketing
Can Focus Groups Be Analysed As Talk?
The Focus Group Guidebook
Serious Games, Debriefing, and Simulation/Gaming as a Discipline
Social learning through rural communities of practice
Visual Climate Change Communication
Localizing Climate Change
Global Warming’s “Six Americas Short Survey”
Constructions of Climate Change on the Radio and in Nepalese Lay Focus Groups
“We're the Ones to Blame”
Social representations of climate change in Swedish lay focus groups
Natural versus anthropogenic climate change
Defining issue-based publics for public engagement
Between God and Green
Visualizing Climate Change
Global warming—global responsibility? Media frames of collective action and scientific certainty
Focus Groups as Qualitative Research
Analyzing & Reporting Focus Group Results
Focus Groups in Social Research
Adaptive and interactive climate futures
Motivators and Barriers to Incorporating Climate Change-Related Health Risks in Environmental Health Impact Assessment
Climate Change and Cerebrospinal Meningitis in the Ghanaian Meningitis Belt
Extreme heat and cultural and linguistic minorities in Australia
To co-produce or not to co-produce
Facilitating climate change adaptation through communication
Transdisciplinary global change research
Public engagement with climate imagery in a changing digital landscape
The social media life of climate change
Climate change governance
Climate change and visual imagery
Reflections on climate change communication research and practice in the second decade of the 21st century
Individual understandings, perceptions, and engagement with climate change
Climate change communication
Climate change communications & young people in the Kingdom
Mixed Methods and Wicked Problems
Redefining maladaptation
Maximising the benefits of participatory climate adaptation research by understanding and managing the associated challenges and risks
Communicating climate (change) uncertainties
New science for global sustainability? The institutionalisation of knowledge co-production in Future Earth
A framework for climate change engagement through video games
Environmental learning in online social networks
Scepticism and uncertainty about climate change
Uncertain climate
Disengaging citizens? Climate change communication and public receptivity
Training interdisciplinary “wicked problem” solvers
Overcoming the tragedy of super wicked problems
Future visioning of local climate change
From convergence to contention
Communicating Climate Change
From Carbon Markets to Carbon Morality
Analyzing Climate Change Communication Through Online Games
Analysing group interaction in focus group research
Barriers perceived to engaging with climate change among the UK public and their policy implications
Developing Focus Group Research
Integrated science and art education for creative climate change communication
A Five-Steps Methodology to Design Communication Formats That Can Contribute to Behavior Change
From Territorial to Temporal Ambitions
A Snapshot of Social Media
Focus groups as social enactments
Learning in focus groups
Focus Groups
The methodology of Focus Groups
| Obras citantes distintas | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 0,8 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2021 - 2026 (6) |
| Velocidad de citación | current |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 4 |