Biofuels
Economic, environmental and social benefits and costs for developing countries in Asia
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12929200 |
|---|---|
| Authors | H Gheewala (0000-0002-4300-1551, Joint Graduate School of Energy and Environment, corresponding author), Beau Damen (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations), Xunpeng Shi (0000-0001-9653-7395, Association of Southeast Asian Nations) |
| Year | 2013 |
| Volume | 4 |
| Issue | 6 |
| Pages | 497-511 |
| Publication date | 2013-07-11 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Climate Change (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1757-7780 • E-ISSN: 1757-7799 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1002/wcc.241 |
| OpenAlex | W2166220269 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
| References cited | 48 |
Biofuels are being supported by many governments for a range of perceived benefits including improved domestic energy security, reduced greenhouse gas ( GHG ) emissions when compared with fossil‐fuel counterparts, and economic development and employment generation, particularly in rural areas. Life‐cycle, cost‐benefit, and systems analyses, however, indicate that the expansion of biofuels can have complex effects on, and interactions with, land use and food and fuel prices. This article reviews the economic, environmental, and social benefits and costs of biofuels using experiences from developing countries in Asia. The review reveals the following: (1) biofuels are generally not economically competitive with fossil fuels and government support, though prevailing, is costly and questionable. (2) Although biofuels are generally viewed to be a threat to food security, if properly managed, their development could lead to improved productivity in the agriculture sector over the long term with benefits for rural livelihoods and food security. (3) Even though reducing GHG emissions is a key driver for the development of biofuels, effects in terms of soil quality, biodiversity, and water quality must also be assessed; the environmental benefits of biofuels are debatable and depend on a range of fuel‐specific factors, management, and agricultural practices. On the basis of this assessment a range of strategies are suggested to further improve the sustainability of biofuels in Asia. WIREs Clim Change 2013, 4:497–511. doi: 10.1002/wcc.241 This article is categorized under: The Carbon Economy and Climate Mitigation > Benefits of Mitigation Climate and Development > Decoupling Emissions from Development
Agriculture · Biofuel · Business · Economics · Energy security · Food prices · Food security · Fossil fuel · Geography · Greenhouse gas · Livelihood · Natural resource economics · Renewable energy · Sustainability · Biofuel production and bioconversion · Energy and Environment Impacts · Water-Energy-Food Nexus Studies · Ecology
Criteria prioritization for the sustainable development of second-generation bioethanol in Thailand using the Delphi-AHP technique
Policy implications and recommendations for sustainable bioenergy development in Ethiopia
The water-energy-food nexus
Biofuels, environmental sustainability, and food security
Use of U.S. Croplands for Biofuels Increases Greenhouse Gases Through Emissions from Land-Use Change
Biofuel Plantations on Forested Lands
The yield gap of global grain production
Land Clearing and the Biofuel Carbon Debt
Is oil palm agriculture really destroying tropical biodiversity?
Food, Fuel, and Climate Change
Carbon payback times for crop-based biofuel expansion in the tropics
Biomass for energy
Bioenergy and water—the implications of large-scale bioenergy production for water use and supply
Global–Local Tensions in Contract Farming of Biofuel Crops Involving Indigenous Communities in the Philippines
Biofuels and the poor
The impact of biofuel growth on agriculture
The Social and Environmental Impacts of Biofuel Feedstock Cultivation
Environmental and Social Impacts of Oil Palm Plantations and their Implications for Biofuel Production in Indonesia
| Unique citing works | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,44 |
| Citation span | 2017 - 2025 (9) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 4 |