Is solar geoengineering ungovernable? A critical assessment of governance challenges identified by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12929276 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Jesse L Reynolds (0000-0002-0624-5741, University of California, Los Angeles, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 12 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Publication date | 2020-11-11 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Climate Change (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1757-7780 • E-ISSN: 1757-7799 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1002/wcc.690 |
| OpenAlex | W3104495751 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 8 |
| References cited | 29 |
Solar radiation modification (SRM) could greatly reduce climate change and associated risks. Yet it has not been well‐received by the climate change expert community. This is evident in the authoritative reports of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), which emphasize SRM's governance, political, social, and ethical challenges. I find seven such challenges identified in the IPCC reports: that SRM could lessen mitigation; that its termination would cause severe climatic impacts; that researching SRM would create a “slippery slope” to its inevitable and unwanted use; that decisions to use it could be contrary to democratic norms; that the public may not accept SRM; that it could be unethical; and that decisions to use SRM could be unilateral. After assessing the extent to which these challenges are supported by existing evidence, scholarly literature, and robust logic, I conclude that, for six of the seven, the IPCC's claims variously are speculative, fail to consider both advantages and disadvantages, implicitly make unreasonable negative assumptions, are contrary to existing evidence, and/or are meaninglessly vague. I suggest some reasons for the reports' failure to meet the IPCC's standards of balance, thoroughness, and accuracy, and recommend a dedicated Special Report on SRM. This article is categorized under: Integrated Assessment of Climate Change > Assessing Climate Change in the Context of Other Issues
Business · Climate change · Climate governance · Context (archaeology · Corporate governance · Environmental planning · Environmental resource management · Geography · Political science · Politics · Climate Change and Geoengineering · Climate Change Communication and Perception · Climate Change Policy and Economics · Environmental Science · Law · Finance
Communication of solar geoengineering science
Solar geoengineering
The political value of letting hopes die
IPCC emission scenarios
Legitimacy and justifiability of non-state geoengineering
Governing marine cloud brightening for ecosystem conservation under a warming climate
A preliminary framework for understanding the governance of novel environmental technologies
Solar Geoengineering
Ethics and intentional climate change
Dual high‐stake emerging technologies
Halving warming with stratospheric aerosol geoengineering moderates policy-relevant climate hazards
Researching geoengineering
The cost of stratospheric aerosol injection through 2100
Strategic incentives for climate geoengineering coalitions to exclude broad participation
Battling Promethean dreams and Trojan horses
The potential for climate engineering with stratospheric sulfate aerosol injections to reduce climate injustice
Solar Geoengineering and Democracy
Learning about climate change solutions in the IPCC and beyond
A mission-driven research program on solar geoengineering could promote justice and legitimacy
Going rogue? Scenarios for unilateral geoengineering
Stratospheric aerosol injection research and existential risk
The Global Politics of Climate Change
Governing the termination problem in solar radiation management
Climate Engineering in Global Climate Governance
Why Solar Radiation Management Geoengineering and Democracy Won't Mix
| Unique citing works | 8 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 2 |
| Citation span | 2022 - 2025 (4) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 8 |