Trends in investments in global energy research, development, and demonstration
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12929374 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Kelly Sims Gallagher (0000-0002-4724-8949, Tufts University, corresponding author), Laura Diaz Anadon (0000-0002-2688-118X), Ruud Kempener, Charlie Wilson (0000-0001-8164-3566, University of East Anglia) |
| Year | 2011 |
| Volume | 2 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 373-396 |
| Publication date | 2011-04-18 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Climate Change (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1757-7780 • E-ISSN: 1757-7799 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1002/wcc.112 |
| OpenAlex | W2131884565 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 6 |
| References cited | 21 |
Recent national trends in investments in global energy research, development, and demonstration (RD&D) are inconsistent around the world. Public RD&D investments in energy are the metric most commonly used in international comparative assessments of energy‐technology innovation, and the metric employed in this article. Overall, the data indicate that International Energy Agency (IEA) member country government investments have been volatile: they peaked in the late 1970s, declined during the subsequent two decades, bottomed out in 1997, and then began to gradually grow again during the 2000s. The allocation of funding for different energy‐technology areas also varies hugely across different countries, but investments in fossil fuel and nuclear technologies continue to dominate spending. We have very poor data for private investments, but it is very likely that they have decreased as a result of the recent recession. Despite their increasing significance in the world's energy sector, little is known about public or private energy innovation investments in the rapidly developing countries. None of the six ‘BRIMCS’ countries reviewed here are members of the IEA, which is one of the few agencies that collects international statistical data on energy RD&D budgets. Like energy RD&D patterns in the United States and other IEA countries, BRIMCS country energy RD&D appears to take place predominantly in fossil fuel and nuclear technologies. WIREs Clim Change 2011 2 373–396 DOI: 10.1002/wcc.112 This article is categorized under: The Carbon Economy and Climate Mitigation > Policies, Instruments, Lifestyles, Behavior
Agency (philosophy · Business · Economic growth · Economics · Fossil fuel · Government (linguistics · Investment (military · Natural resource economics · Political science · Private sector · Climate Change Policy and Economics · Energy, Environment, Economic Growth · Engineering · Environmental Impact and Sustainability
Clumsy solutions and climate change
How informal institutions drive innovation
Predicting attitudes towards fusion energy in Europe
From fossil to low carbon
Leaders and followers in finance mobilization for renewable energy in Germany and China
Designing industrial strategy for a low carbon transformation
The Positive sum strategy
The influence of market demand upon innovation
Near-term technology policies for long-term climate targets—economy wide versus technology specific approaches
Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention
Technology Diffusion and Public Policy
Innovation and Learning
| Unique citing works | 6 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,75 |
| Citation span | 2018 - 2025 (8) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 6 |