Epistemology contra methodology

Theoretical oversights in the call towards practicality

Bibliographic Data

ID12930730
AuthorsHayder Al‐mohammad (corresponding author)
Year1970
Volume12
Issue1
Publication date1970-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAnthropology Matters (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1758-6453 • E-ISSN: 1758-6453
PublisherNomadIT (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.22582/am.v12i1.185
OpenAlexW1585399612
LanguageEN
References cited17

One of the distinguishing features of anthropology is its reliance on the ethnographic method of sustained, long-term fieldwork in a given ‘field’ or set of ‘fields’. This reliance on practical engagement along with the rise in the popularity of practice theory and embodiment as a paradigm of not only the acquisition and performance of knowledge but also as a founded mode of being in a world has resulted in discursive and epistemic deadlocks or limitations being translated into or as practical or methodological deadlocks. In this paper I want to highlight the theoretical oversights of reliance on practicality as a means of dealing with issues which in essence are epistemic and categorial but which are translated as methodological problems. After exemplifying these categorial misnomers I want to propose that what we as anthropologists encounter in many cases as insufficiencies in our understanding of certain topics cannot be overcome with more sophisticated and nuanced methods but rather we gain more by acknowledging such insufficiencies as constituting the type of knowledge we are trying to gain

Epistemology · Ethnography · Field (mathematics · Human–computer interaction · Mode (computer interface · Popularity · Set (abstract data type · Sociology · Anthropology · Anthropology: Ethics, History, Culture · Computer Science · Mathematics · Philosophy · Psychology · Social Psychology

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access