The strengths and difficulties questionnaire self-report
Sensitivity and specificity testing to identify conduct problems in Indonesian adolescents
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12936823 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Sonny Tirta Luzanil (University of Indonesia, corresponding author), Sherly Saragih Turnip (0000-0001-7509-4855, University of Indonesia) |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 13 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 226-237 |
| Publication date | 2021-09-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Aggression Conflict and Peace Research (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1759-6599 • E-ISSN: 2042-8715 |
| Publisher | Emerald Publishing Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1108/jacpr-01-2021-0569 |
| OpenAlex | W3198886308 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 36 |
Purpose The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) has been validated as a screening tool for identifying difficulties in adolescents in various countries. According to the results, the SDQ needs clinical evaluations to discriminate between adolescents with and without problems. This study is part of a research group that developed the self-report Indonesian version of the SDQ. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the self-report Indonesian version of the SDQ conduct problems subscale and identify the optimum cut-off score for Indonesian adolescents. Design/methodology/approach This study was a double-blind non-experimental study, in which the self-report SDQ score was compared to the diagnostic interview. Participants that completed the SDQ were 708 10th-grade students in Jakarta, with 40 students from the sample randomly selected through the double-blind technique for the diagnostic interview. Findings Crosstab’s analysis showed that the SDQ conduct problems subscale had a sensitivity value of 77.3% and a specificity value of 83.3%. Receiver operating characteristics analysis showed that the cut-off score of 4 used in this study is ideal for identifying individuals with conduct problems. Originality/value The SDQ has good accuracy for screening conduct problems among adolescents. Moreover, it will be helpful for parents, teachers, professionals and adolescents to screening conduct problems
Developmental psychology · Indonesian · Mental health · Originality · Psychiatry · Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire · Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development · Clinical Psychology · Early Childhood Education and Development · Family and Disability Support Research · Psychology · Social Psychology
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
When to Use Broader Internalising and Externalising Subscales Instead of the Hypothesised Five Subscales on the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ)
Predicting type of psychiatric disorder from Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) scores in child mental health clinics in London and Dhaka
The Development and Well‐Being Assessment
Comparing the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire and the Child Behavior Checklist
The high societal costs of childhood conduct problems
Psychometric Properties of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire
The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire
Mental Health and the Covid-19 Pandemic
Recent advances in research on school-based extracurricular activities and adolescent development
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,33 |
| Citation span | 2023 - 2023 (1) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |